Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Perth and Kinross councillors urged to reject Saddlehill windfarm plans

An artist's impression of how Saddlehill windfarm would look.
An artist's impression of how Saddlehill windfarm would look.

A controversial windfarm proposal which straddles the boundary of Perth and Kinross and Angus has been dealt another major blow.

Councillors will be recommended on Wednesday to reject the application for a 14 turbine development at Black Hill, Glen Isla – following the lead of their counterparts on Angus Council.

They refused the application when it came before them in March after a storm of protest against the “industrial scale” Saddlehill windfarm which objectors claimed would destroy the tourist attraction of Glen Isla to visitors.

The developers Wind Prospect said the £45 million Saddle Hill scheme would have provided enough power for a fifth of the homes in Angus and deliver a £4m community bounty over the next 25 years.

Angus councillors backed the refusal recommendation of their officials after hearing the 115-metre high turbines, eight of which fell within their boundary and six within Perth and Kinross, would be visible from Perth, the Sidlaws and the Angus Munros.

Now Perth and Kinross Council’s development management committee are being asked to follow suit.

A report before the committee from development quality manager Nick Brian notes that the application had attracted a number of representations both for and against the proposals.

A total of 378 letters of objections had been received on grounds including unacceptable design, being out of scale and the impact on the landscape character of the Cairngorms and Glen Isla.

Other points raised included the visual impact on tourist walking routes and concerns over damage to the ecology and protected species.

Those backing the proposal – 123 letters of support were received – said it would contribute to renewable energy targets, reduce electricity bills, provide employment and generate financial benefits for the community.

Mr Brian is not convinced by the merits of the application and recommends that councillors refuse the application which “by virtue of the location, dominance, scale and layout of the proposed windfarm would result in unacceptable adverse landscape impacts”.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]