Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Irate Highland Perthshire residents claim historic battlefield site will be ruined by A9 dualling

Killiecrankie residents who oppose the A9 dualling.
Killiecrankie residents who oppose the A9 dualling.

The historic site of a famous Jacobite victory dating back to 1689 could be forever ruined as a result of the £3 billion A9 dualling, irate residents have claimed.

Neighbouring community members have banded together as they feel their concerns over the impact of building a new carriageway through the site of the ancient battleground at Killiecrankie are being ignored.

The Scottish Government plans to build the new carriageway to the south of the A9 for the Pitlochry Killiecrankie Pass to Blair Atholl Garry Bridge section.

The existing A9 goes through part of the ancient Killiecrankie battleground but local residents bitterly oppose the new dualling route.

They state it will have a detrimental affect on existing properties and will impact on the Killiecrankie battlefield memorial cairn.

They also suggest houses and businesses to the south of the current A9 will be affected by traffic noise.

Instead, they want the new carriageway built to the north of the A9 and state they’ve received no explanation from the Scottish Government as to why this can’t be done despite lodging a letter of complaint to them.

Daniel Price, who owns Killiecrankie battlefield land on both sides of the A9, said: “The construction company (Jacobs) invited me to private meetings as a land owner — purely, I suspect, so that they can tick boxes showing they have done what the process requires them to do, without ever taking the points I have made seriously.

“I have repeatedly invited them to come and look at the ground in question but they have only just taken up my offer.”

He continued: “As the current recommendations stand, the Scottish Government is proposing the new A9 carriageway be built to the south of the existing road, thereby causing the most destruction, while the grass covered fields to the north stand empty.

“It just does not make sense.”

And James Rattray, who lives at the Coach House, Killiecrankie, around 300 metres from the A9, added: “We discovered we have all been asking the same questions. Several of us have written letters expressing our concerns to the developers about the damage and impact they will cause by building the new carriageway to the south of the existing A9, when there are open fields on the opposite side of the road.

“Our legitimate concerns have not been taken seriously.”

The residents and businesses directly affected by the proposed A9 dualling have sent a formal letter of complaint to the Scottish Transport Minister Humza Yousaf regarding the planned route through the historic battlefield.

And Murdo Fraser, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, said he feels the residents’ concerns should be heard.

“The Battle of Killiecrankie is the site of one of the Jacobites most stunning victories and I would hope that the contractors and Transport Scotland work together to preserve it,” he said.

“As the A9 dualling works progress, there will continue to be conflicts over where best to place the carriageway and it is vital that the contractors and Transport Scotland give residents fair hearing during this process.”

A Transport Scotland spokesperson confirmed they had conducted a metal detecting survey of the battlefield to help with the A9 dualling design and minimise any impact on this “important” historical site.

“As part of our ambitious duallling programme, we are now taking forward the next stage of design with a view to publishing draft road orders for formal comment later this year,” he said.

“We have recently received the complaint letter and will consider its contents and respond in due course.”

The A9 dualling is one of Scotland’s largest transport infrastructure programmes which aims to upgrade 80 miles of single carriageway between Perth and Inverness.