Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Clerical error delays legal agreement for controversial housing plan

Graphic of cycle path at Almond Valley.
Graphic of cycle path at Almond Valley.

A legal agreement that should see a controversial housing plan finally get the green light has been delayed – for the fifth time this year.

The complex 650-page section 75 agreement is being scrutinised by three separate legal teams but once signed it will lead to a planning agreement for the Almond Valley scheme.

The plan aims to build 1,300 homes on land between Huntingtowerfield and Ruthvenfield, along with a primary school and leisure facilities.

Almond Valley has been mooted for around 20 years and has faced the ire of some local residents, who oppose it. Long-term critic Kenny Simpson, chair of Methven and District Community Council, has claimed the development would “completely ruin” the character of the area.

The plan has gone through a series of twists and turns, including a public inquiry and a hearing at the Court of Session. Perth and Kinross Council knocked the proposal back in 2004 and 2011, and then removed it from their local development plan in January 2012.

However, matters were turned on their head in October 2013 when the Scottish Government stated Almond Valley should be incorporated into the local authority’s adopted local plan. The council again rejected the plan in May last year but the developers, the Pilkington Trust, appealed this decision to the Scottish Government’s directorate of planning appeals division and this proved to be successful.

But a required legal agreement between all parties has now been delayed – for the fifth time this year. This means the document will now need to be lodged by August 31 with the Scottish Government reporter.

Previous requests for an extension of the timescale were requested in January, March, April and May for legal reasons and due to the complexity of the legal document. The latest request for a delay stems from a clerical error.

Alastair Wood, head of planning Scotland at Savills, who act on behalf of the Pilkington Trust, said: “The legal document has had to be re-issued for signature, but unfortunately one of the required signatories is now on holiday and will not return until early August.”

Mr Wood had recently claimed there is a “pent-up” demand for housing in Perth and that work could begin on the site next year.