Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Council fight for cash over rejected windfarm scheme

Wind turbines in Perthshire.
Wind turbines in Perthshire.

Perth and Kinross Council is demanding payment from developers behind a rejected windfarm scheme.

In a highly unusual move, the local authority has tabled a claim for expenses from the landowner leading the controversial Strathallan project.

Council bosses argue they shouldn’t be left out of pocket fighting a turbines plan which – they claim – has no chance of winning.

The nine-mast plan at Greenacres, between Comrie and Braco, was rejected by councillors in April and is now the subject of an appeal to the Scottish Government.

A similar, smaller plan for four turbines was thrown out by the same committee in 2009, a decision upheld on appeal.

Councillor Murray Lyle said at the time that the project leaders were attempting to “defend the indefensible”.

Green Cat Renewables, which is working on the project with landowner Bruce Walker, argued that the larger scheme was more acceptable.

“The need to develop renewable energy to fight climate change has never been greater,” said director Gavin Catto.

Now the council has submitted a claim for expenses with the Scottish Government.

Officers want Mr Walker to pay for an undisclosed amount of “unnecessary expense” brought about by the appeals process.

In a strongly-worded letter to the government’s appeals division, planning officer John Russell said: “It should have been clear from the decision on the previous appeal in respect of the same site and a similar development character that a windfarm proposal would not be permitted.

“Adding a further five turbines with a negligible reduction in turbine height of seven metres from the previously refused scheme could not alleviate all the previous reasons for refusal.”

He added: “There is no basis on which the appellant can reasonably claim to believe that they could succeed in this appeal, given the site history and the previous reasons for refusal.

“For whatever reason, the appellant has chosen to disregard the outcome of the earlier appeal, that this is not an appropriate site for windfarm development.

“As the planning position is clear, Perth and Kinross Council should not have been forced to incur unnecessary expense in participating in this appeal.”

In the last six years, local authorities throughout the UK have paid out about £12 million in planning appeal costs.

Green Cat Renewables is meantime claiming expenses against the council, claiming it failed to “properly balance the benefits of the application against the negative impacts”.

The firm also alleges the council did not determine the application in a “timely fashion”.

The Scottish Government is expected to rule on the appeal before the end of the year.