Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Work grinds to a halt as firm behind lavish Taymouth Castle project faces collapse

Taymouth Castle
Taymouth Castle

The company behind plans for a “world-class” hotel at an historic Perthshire castle is facing collapse.

Rebus Construction, the main contractor in the chequered Taymouth Castle project, has been threatened with dissolution by Companies House following an HMRC tax probe.

It comes after four people who maintained the estate for the company lost their jobs.

Rebus Construction, which lists Taymouth Castle project leader Clynt Wellington as its sole director, could be dissolved and struck off within weeks, with all of its properties and rights claimed by the Crown.

The castle was recently bought by Mount Two Ltd, an offshore firm led by Mr Wellington.

The Courier understands a group of private investors, who are bankrolling the restoration project, are now in talks with Mr Wellington about taking over the hotel.

A source close to the estate confirmed that work refurbishing the castle’s rooms had ground to a halt. It is understood Mr Wellington has already rejected at least two offers to buy the castle in recent months.

Previous owners Meteor Asset Management spent about £23 million refurbishing the A-listed building, which was famously visited by Queen Victoria and Prince Albert.

Last year, Mount Two received planning consent for more alterations to the property.

Archie McLaren was one of four people who lost their jobs at the estate in January.

He is now taking Rebus to an employment tribunal, despite the company’s claims that he was self-employed.

Mr McLaren said he was tasked by previous operators Farnham Development to help maintain the estate, although not the castle.

“When they went bust in 2012, we were told to continue working as normal. We were always paid every month and our taxes were always deducted.”

He said: “But we never received payslips or P60s. We spent five years asking for them, and eventually went to HMRC to get them.”

Mr McLaren said HMRC then investigated Rebus and were able to establish he was an employee – a claim the company has always contested.

Mr McLaren’s employment lawyer Alison Forsyth, of Forsyth Employment Law, said dates for a hearing were still be scheduled.

“We have had to establish that Mr McLaren was actually employed by Rebus, and not self-employed,” she said. “We have had to look at how he was paid, who paid his wages and whose equipment he used to carry out his work.”

The restoration of Taymouth Castle has been backed by more than 70 investors, who have been described as co-owners.

In a submission to Perth and Kinross Council planners, agents for Mount Two said the internal alterations were “critical in terms of the new investor’s business plan to ensure the castle renovation and operation is financially viable”.

No one from Rebus Construction, Mount Two Ltd or from Mr Wellington’s office could be reached for comment.

Chequered history of changes at estate

Taymouth Castle has seen various plans for development submitted to the council since 2005.

In March 2005, Taymouth Castle Estates Ltd were granted permission for a plan which proposed to build 72 hotel suites, a spa, 63 lodges, 26 fractional ownership houses and an equestrian centre.

During 2005/2006, eradication of rot and stabilisation of the building took place as well as replacing the roof and the installation of new windows in the main tower and west wing.

And non-structural timer partitions were removed at this time.

In June 2011, a plan submitted by Meteor Asset Management to build 89 estate properties, 14 hotel suites and a spa was approved. Further internal 
partitioning was begun but not completed to the second and third floors of the main tower.

Internal partitions were removed in the second floor.

In February 2015, a plan lodged by Barrasford and Bird to transform 13 hotel rooms was permitted but it is understood work stalled on this due to 
financial problems.

This month, a mystery owner submitted plans to create 23 smaller hotel bedrooms at the castle. This has been passed by the council under delegated powers.

Already a subscriber? Sign in