Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Boris Johnson issues warning over fishing rights as Brexit trade battle with EU begins

Scottish crews will be watching the trade negotiations with keen interest.
Scottish crews will be watching the trade negotiations with keen interest.

Boris Johnson has told the European Union that UK waters will be “first and foremost for British boats” ahead of a gruelling 11-month trade negotiation.

Mr Johnson, in a speech in London this afternoon, said he was “ready to consider an agreement on fisheries”, but made clear that Britain will, like Norway, have annual negotiations on access to waters.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson delivers his Unleashing Britain’s Potential speech in the Painted Hall, Old Royal Naval College Greenwich, London.

The issue is likely to prove one of the major sticking points in the trade talks to come, as the EU has already made “reciprocal access” to waters a key part of any wider trade deal.

Michel Barnier, the EU’s chief Brexit negotiator, reiterated that point this morning, telling the EU Commission that any UK/EU agreement “should provide for continued reciprocal access to markets, and to waters, with stable quota shares”.

Fisheries is just one area of disagreement however, as the prime minister also dismissed demands from the EU for a “level playing field” on areas like workers’ rights, the environment, tax and state aid.

Setting out his demands, Mr Johnson said: “There is no need for a free trade agreement to involve accepting EU rules on competition policies, subsidies, social protection, the environment or anything similar, any more than the EU should be obliged to accept UK rules.

“The UK will maintain the highest standards in these areas, better in many respects than those of the EU, without the compulsion of a treaty.”

He added: “We want a comprehensive free trade agreement similar to Canada’s, but in the unlikely event that we do not succeed then our trade will have to be based on our existing withdrawal agreement with the EU.

“The question is whether we agree a trading relationship with the EU comparable to Canada’s or more like Australia’s and I have no doubt that in either case the UK will prosper mightily.”

Mr Barnier insisted the EU was ready to make an “exceptional offer” for a comprehensive deal, but that it was conditional on competition remaining “open and fair” with “specific and effective guarantees” to ensure a level playing field over the long term.

European Union chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier

“That means mechanisms to uphold the high standards we have on social, environmental, climate, tax and state aid matters,” he said.

Mr Barnier also insisted the UK must agree a role for the European Court of Justice (ECJ) if it wants to agree a new binding security partnership with the EU, but Mr Johnson suggested there was “no need” for a new treaty in many of these areas.

The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) raised fears that businesses could well be caught in the crossfire during the trade talks.

CBI president John Allan said industry optimism was returning but warned that talk of a “bare bones” trade deal could “pause” investment.

“The challenge is to ensure business confidence is not caught in the crossfire of a tough, public negotiation,” he said.

 


Analysis: Boris and Michel lock horns as the hard work begins

Prime Minister Boris Johnson

Three days after the UK left the EU, on paper at least, the work to make Brexit a reality really begins.

Until December 31 the UK will be in the “transition period”, meaning little will actually change while Brussels and London attempt to agree a future trading relationship.

If an agreement is not reached by July 1 this year, the last time at which the EU can extend the transition period, the UK will leave the EU without a deal at the end of the year.

Today, both Boris Johnson and Michel Barnier set out their visions for a post-Brexit trading relationship and already a number of flashpoints have emerged.

Below we take a look at some of the key areas of disagreement:

 

Fisheries

What the EU says: Besides the cooperation on conservation, management and regulation, the objective of the provisions on fisheries should be to uphold Union fishing activities. In particular, it should aim to avoid economic dislocation for Union fishermen that have traditionally fished in the United Kingdom waters. To reach this objective, the provisions on fisheries should build on existing reciprocal access conditions, quota shares and the traditional activity of the Union fleet.

What the UK says: The UK will become an independent coastal state at the end of 2020 and any agreement must reflect this reality. The UK will, like Norway, Iceland and the Faroe Islands, have annual negotiations with the EU on access to waters and fishing opportunities, and will consider a mechanism for cooperation on fisheries matters.

What does it mean?: The EU has made fisheries a key part of the talks and has tied the issue into wider negotiations, meaning if an agreement on fishing is not reached the whole deal could be jeopardised. The fishing sector accounts for about 0.1% of the UK’s economy as a whole and fears have been raised that fishermen could end up being thrown overboard if it means securing a wider deal, the prime minister’s words today will provide reassurance but this issue will run and run.

 

EU standards

What the EU says: The UK can have a zero-tariff, zero-quota, free trade agreement in exchange for maintaining EU standards on workers’ rights, environmental protection and state aid.

What the UK says: There is no need for a free trade agreement to involve accepting EU rules on competition policies, subsidies, social protection, the environment or anything similar, any more than the EU should be obliged to accept UK rules.

What does it mean?: Boris Johnson’s argument here is that the UK surpasses the EU in protecting animal welfare and workers’ rights, so there is no need for formal alignment. That argument may hold at this present time, but the EU will be looking more long term. If Mr Johnson does indeed want a trade deal with the US, for example, then what will the UK have to accept in return? And will that see a lowering of standards? Cue the chlorinated chicken debate.

 

Gibraltar

What the EU says: Gibraltar will not be included in the territorial scope of the agreements to be concluded between the Union and the United Kingdom.

What the UK says: In its negotiations with the EU, the Government will be acting on behalf of the UK Crown Dependencies and Overseas Territories: the whole UK family.

What does it mean?: British sovereignty over Gibraltar was formalised by the treaty of Utrecht in 1713 but Spain has always bristled at the idea of UK ownership. The EU and UK could reach separate agreements on Gibraltar, but this will require approval from Madrid.

 

European courts

What the EU says: The European Court of Justice “should be able to continue its role in full” arbitrating on matters of data sharing and extradition.

What the UK says: Downing Street insists there is no need for ECJ oversight of its trade deal.

What does it mean?: This area has been left vague by both sides, the Tories are very resistant to the ECJ having any oversight of the UK after the transition ends. A new arbitration body to determine disputes could well have to be created.

 

Do the sides agree on anything?

Both Boris Johnson and Michel Barnier have spoken optimistically of their desire to reach an agreement, but both have acknowledged the process could end without a deal.

It was an opening that many expected, with both pitching their preferred trade deals. As we have discovered in the last three years, what will be concluded will likely be a compromise somewhere in between.