Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Hedge rage’ campaigners to address Scottish Parliament committee

A high hedge
A high hedge

Householders affected by so-called ‘hedge rage’ in Tayside and Fife will have their say on the effectiveness of recently approved Scottish Parliament legislation when they address a committee of MSPs on Wednesday.

Members of campaign group Scothedge will claim that “serious loopholes” have become apparent in the High Hedges (Scotland) Act – passed in 2013 – although there have also been many success stories.

Pamala  and James McDougall, from Inverkeilor, set up campaign group Scothedge in the year 2000 when they became involved in a dispute with a neighbour over a high hedge bordering their properties.

They were “absolutely thrilled” when the High Hedges (Scotland) Act came in, giving local authorities powers backed by statute to deal with high hedge problems.

When is a high hedge too high?
When is a high hedge too high?

But Mrs McDougall told The Courier the review was much needed because there are loopholes in the law which need to be unblocked.

She said: “We will submit that many of the local councils have misinterpreted the law and denied justice to hedge victims.

“Because the law states that the time local authorities should respond to a request for a high hedge notice to giving a decision to the complainant ‘in a timely way’, some councils have used the wording to extend the time unreasonably.

“We think there should be a time limit set so cases do not drag on for months.

“The wording is too loose in the guidelines regarding ‘a right to reasonable enjoyment of the property’ which is very subjective.

“We believe a tighter definition should be used, with a right to light in home and garden.”

A disputed high hedge in Fife
A disputed high hedge in Fife

The Local Government and Communities Committee, which started collating information on February 6, said it wanted to hear from people on how the law has worked and whether it could be strengthened.

Convener Bob Doris said overgrown hedges could be “a serious nuisance”.

The legislation was introduced following a members’ bill by SNP MSP Mark McDonald, who said overgrown hedges could blight people’s lives.

It came into force in 2014, defining a “high hedge” as a row of two or more evergreen or semi-evergreen trees or shrubs which rises to more than two metres above ground level and forms a barrier to light.

The law allows people to apply to their local authority for a “high hedge notice” if their neighbours’ hedge “adversely affects the enjoyment” of their home to an unreasonable extent.

Councils can step in to settle disputes, and can issue enforcement orders to hedge owners or even carry out work themselves.

Examine

Mr Doris said the committee wanted to examine how well the legislation has worked in the three years since it came into force.

The closing date for receipt of submissions was Monday March 20.

Speaking after the meeting, Mr Doris, said: “It’s clear that many people are still blighted by overgrown hedges in Scotland. Today we heard that, in some extreme cases, high hedges not only cause people to live in darkness but the situation can also impact everyday life – leading to stress and mental health issues.

“We’ll hear from local authorities in May to continue our scrutiny of the Act as we seek to establish whether there is scope to improve the legislation.”