Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

US-led air strikes on Syria were ‘necessary and legitimate’, says former St Andrews University Syrian exile

US-UK-France airstrikes in Syria in 2018
US-UK-France airstrikes in Syria in 2018

A St Andrews University graduate whose family was forced to flee the “two evils” of Syrian government barrel bombs and so-called Islamic State (IS) beheadings has described the recent military action by the USA, UK and France in Syria as “necessary and legitimate”.

In an exclusive interview with The Courier, Haian Dukhan, who left Syria in 2012 to study for his PhD in international relations at St Andrews University, said action against the regime that used chemical weapons against its own people was justified because President Assad had “crossed a red line”.

However, he warned that the main problem for such military action by western powers is the lack of a long term vision for the future of Syria.

Haian Dhukan, formerly of St Andrews University

Haian, 36, who graduated from St Andrews last summer and is currently a teaching fellow in International Relations at Leicester University, said: “A limited military strike could probably destroy some of the regime’s chemical facilities but it will not fully limit the capability of the Syrian regime to continue killing civilians.

“The Syrian regime has killed more civilians by using conventional weapons.

“Some might wonder why Assad would use chemical weapons when he is already winning the war.

Haian Dhukan, a Syrian, is a former PhD student at St Andrews University

“In fact, the area that was targeted by chemical weapons was a very fortified area that the regime has besieged for more than seven years and wasn’t able to achieve any military advance in it.

“The purpose behind the use of the chemical weapons was to kill large numbers of people in a short period of time and send a message to the rebels entrenched in the area that if you don’t surrender, this will be your destiny.

“The regime did this knowing that Russia will protect it in the security council by using the veto.”

Combat engineers of the Russian Armed Forces’ International Mine Action Center clearing mines from the ancient town of Palmyra in 2016

Growing up in the ancient historical city of Palmyra, Haian had first-hand experience of Assad’s regime which suppressed freedom of speech and bred resentment through the persistence of economic poverty.

When widespread discontent at similar economic hardship, autocratic rule and corruption toppled Tunisia’s President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali in January 2011, Haian celebrated the dawn of the pro-democracy ‘Arab Spring’ and quietly welcomed the rebellion which began in the rural lands around his town.

But he said millions of Haian’s own peace loving country-folk, including his own family of “moderate Muslims”who fled to Turkey, quickly found themselves caught between Assad’s rebel-crushing regime and the rise of IS which has brought in its own level of brutality.

As someone who has been living in exile for around seven years, Haian says he can’t claim to speak in the name of all Syrians who still live the horrors of the war.

He says Syrians’ views on the western strikes vary from one person to another.

However, he generally remains worried about the future of his country and the possibility of regional hostilities escalating.

An RAF Tornado comes into land at RAF Akrotiri after concluding its bombing mission in Syria.

He added: “What started in Syria as a national uprising against an authoritarian regime in 2011 has turned into an international proxy war waged between different regional and international powers.

“The Syrian conflict will not be resolved unless these powers have an agreement among each other.

“It seems that we are heading towards a state that is divided into different regions where each of these regions has regional and international players who control it and influence its direction.

The guided-missile cruiser USS Monterey (CG 61) fires a Tomahawk land attack missile at Syria on April 13.

“There are increasing concerns about the possibility of an Israeli/Iranian conflict over Syrian territories as well.

“There doesn’t seem to be any good signs about the near future in Syria unfortunately.”