Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

READERS’ LETTERS: Tory tax plans and Old Firm machinations – will the rich get richer while the woke run wild?

Douglas Ross manifesto
Scottish Conservative Party leader Douglas Ross

Sir, – I was struck by proposals in the Conservative Party’s manifesto to cut income tax for higher earners.

This demonstrates how out of touch the Tories really are, planning tax cuts for the rich while delivering further austerity and widening the gap between rich and poor.

Tory proposals would increase the £43,663 annual earnings threshold at which people start paying the higher rate to match the UK Government’s £50,271.

The Institute for Fiscal Studies has highlighted that such cuts make a Tory pledge of £2 billion for health spending unachievable.

Each Tory MSP will save £1,321 under their own proposals and tax cuts, giving the wealthiest more money while cutting the NHS budget, is most definitely not the right priority as we recover from the Covid-pandemic and seek to deliver a fairer society.

Alex Orr.
Marchmont Road, Edinburgh.

 

More authorititive government needed

Sir, – Bob Thompson’s letter (Frightened to speak lest it cause offence, Courier, April 20) brings focus to the problems afflicting our society.

Our current generation of “yoof” seem to have lost all respect for authority and the need for social cohesion in order for the well-being of our people to prosper.

We seem to be submerged in adulation for “Americanisms” such as “woke”.

In my view it is simply an expression associated with intolerance and the mistaken idea that society can prosper without adherence to social rules in any needed redress of minority disenfranchisement.

Rudeness prevails in social communication when there are self-interested pressure-groups parading their narrow opinions and disallowing anyone to disagree with them.

If some of our citizens feel disenfranchised, then first line of redress should be our MPs.
A further affliction is the ingress of Big Business into every aspect of life.

This leads to cronyism, corruption, and further demolition of the standards of decency that gave rise to world respect for British values.

It gets to a point where the people who should be society’s role-models for adherence to established moral standards, succumb to the temptations of personal enrichment and personality marketing.

We now have the proposed destruction of football tradition in this country, the architects of which are the foreign owners of major UK clubs, funded by tens of billions of dollars by American investment banks.

Is it reasonable to pay star footballers millions of pounds, and to recover these absurd expenses by ignoring the importance of fan support and instead, striking short-term financial deals with competing media platforms?

The question is how to recover society from the slippery slope down which it is sliding, and the answer would seem to be a more authoritative form of governance with less faux division, and a hard look at the impact of foreign-owned big-business on our younger, impressionable, generation.

Derek Farmer.
Knightsward Farm, Anstruther.

 

Super League not the danger in Scotland

Sir, –The anger at the proposed breakaway by elite football clubs risks overshadowing an even more egregious outrage actively being considered for Scottish football.

These are proposals made jointly by Rangers and Celtic to run their second teams in the Scottish lower leagues, in exchange for a modest cash injection to other member clubs.

At a time when a full meritocratic football pyramid, top to bottom, is almost in place, this idea is almost universally rejected by all lower league club fans.

The distortion of competition, let alone the contamination of community connections, is unacceptable so I would be boycotting any games involving the Old Firm reserves.

If the large clubs want to ensure competition for their over large squads, let them restart a reserve league.

This model may be familiar in certain European lower leagues and even, shamefully, in the Challenge Cup here.

But it is a step too far right here on our doorstep.

Allen Armstrong.
Viewforth, Buckhaven.