Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Salmond inquiry: Anger at late release of 300 new evidence documents

Former First Minister Alex Salmond.

Hundreds of new documents have been submitted to Holyrood’s Salmond inquiry at the “11th hour”, the committee has confirmed.

MSPs criticised the Scottish Government over the move, claiming it was “part of a wider pattern of behaviour” related to the “continuing obstruction of the committee’s work”.

It is the latest dispute between the committee and the Holyrood government.

The committee heard hearing evidence on Tuesday morning from Scottish Government witnesses Judith Mackinnon, head of people advice, and Gillian Russell, director of health workforce.

Committee convener Linda Fabiani opened the public session by revealing the Scottish Government had submitted 300 new documents on Monday evening, with more to follow.

Salmond inquiry committee documents
Committee convener Linda Fabiani.

“I wish to highlight the position the committee is in today in relation to the written evidence to inform this session,” she said.

“Around 300 documents were received yesterday afternoon, and given the complexity of  the legal restrictions on the committee’s work, parliamentary officials now require to process these documents before publication.

“We also anticipate around a further 100 documents from the government and the timescale for this is to be confirmed.

“These documents also require to be processed before their publication.

I speak for the committee when I say this is not a satisfactory way to proceed in effective scrutiny but we will persevere in the interests of progressing the task the parliament has tasked this committee to fulfil.”

Linda Fabiani

“The deputy first minister’s letter on this matter highlighted that witnesses attending today are not in a position to answer any matter which is not in these documents where contempt of court is a consideration.

“On that basis the committee is asking questions today in the absence of written evidence that the government considers witnesses can answer questions upon.

“I speak for the committee when I say this is not a satisfactory way to proceed in effective scrutiny but we will persevere in the interests of progressing the task the parliament has tasked this committee to fulfil.”

Salmond inquiry committee documents
Jackie Baillie MSP.

‘It is beyond disappointing’

Labour MSP Jackie Baillie, also a committee member, said the move by the government reflected a wider problem.

“I think think we should put on record that it was actually at 4.45 last night that the Scottish Government provided the documents to this committee,” she said.

“By anybody’s reckoning that is the 11th hour and 59th minute.

“The letter from John Swinney asking us not to reference certain information is extremely difficult for the committee, on the basis that we do not have the written evidence in front of us.

It is clear to me that this is part of a wider pattern of behaviour, and it disrespects both the committee and parliament.”

Jackie Baillie

“And therefore it makes it difficult to ensure that the committee is sticking to the restrictions placed on us.

“We know, though, that that information was returned to the Scottish Government by Levy and McRae some weeks ago, so it is beyond disappointing that it is now, only now, being provided to committee.

“I think this committee needs to reserve the right to recall the witnesses that we have before us today when we have seen these documents.

“And can I express my anger at the continuing obstruction of the committee’s work by the Scottish Government.

“It is clear to me that this is part of a wider pattern of behaviour, and it disrespects both the committee and parliament.”