Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

EXCLUSIVE: Dundee chief John Nelms addresses ‘yes’ vote after Dark Blues fan group demands answers on club’s U-turn

John Nelms has found himself at the heart of controversy over SPFL vote
John Nelms has found himself at the heart of controversy over SPFL vote

Dundee chief John Nelms told fans a ‘yes’ vote was the best possible deal for the club after supporters questioned his U-turn in the SPFL voting saga.

He responded to an email today from the Dundee Supporters Association (DSA) – which comprises 34 clubs and over 1,000 members – after they demanded answers over the Dens Park side’s stance on the controversial proposal that handed titles to rivals Dundee United, Raith Rovers and Cove Rangers.

The Dark Blues have been at the centre of the storm that engulfed Scottish football since last Friday’s requested deadline where their ‘no’ vote failed to arrive with the SPFL and subsequently saw the club holding the decisive call for five days.

The club issued a statement at lunchtime on Wednesday outlining their side in the furore but fell short of declaring their intention to later change to a ‘yes’ vote which sparked outcry from a number of Dark Blues fans when it emerged.

The vote also brought forward league reconstruction talks – a stipulation Nelms had made clear would be in exchange for a ‘yes’ to minimise the financial harm inflicted on some clubs by the original resolution.

The reaction to this week’s events has been mixed across the Dundee fan group – some positive and many refraining from casting judgement – but amongst that there has also been real anger.

Some supporters are dismayed while others feel dismayed by the change of decision from Nelms, prompting the request for answers from the DSA.

The concern from many is the move did little for the club’s interests while, at the same time, gifted the Championship title to their fiercest rivals.

The email sent by the DSA committee – which The Courier has seen – said: “We are sure everyone felt a sense of relief yesterday with the casting of the Dundee FC vote in regards to the SPFL resolution of April 8 but are disappointed that the club has not yet offered a statement to clarify the Dundee FC position or explain the change of mind in the voting process from a ‘No’ to a ‘Yes’.

“We would urge you therefore to make one as soon as possible to put an end to the conjecture which still continues.

“Supporters of Dundee Football Club have been patient over the last few days while trusting that the club would make the correct decision in not just our interests and but the interests of Scottish football as a whole and would welcome a public statement of clarity.

“The statement issued by the club yesterday was thought to be vague in some quarters and we feel did not clarify or explain our voting position and so we would like to request that the club do this as soon as is practically possible.”

John Nelms has kept a low profile during his time at Dens Park
John Nelms has kept a low profile during his time at Dens Park

Nelms – who has been at Dens Park since 2013 – moved quickly to try to assuage fears from the fans and responded with a statement.

He said: “By way of further explanation of our statement from April 15, Dundee FC submitted its vote to the SPFL and issued its statement simultaneously.

“There was no changing of our vote at any time that day as has been reported in some channels.

“If what we achieved in our pause was presented by the SPFL in the first instance we would have voted in favour of the proposal on 10 April 2020.

“We have achieved the best deal possible out of a situation that was going to be bad for us in any iteration that was being proposed.

“Let us be clear, no matter what the proposal looked like, the majority of the clubs in the Premiership and the Championship are proponents of promotion/relegation.

“Any solution that did not include this would not have enough support to be passed.  Therefore, the SPFL chose to include it to expedite the conclusion, but without considering the ramifications to all clubs.

“Most importantly for Dundee FC, we spoke to other member clubs regarding their appetite for reconstruction, as the SPFL’s briefing notes did not give us much of a chance.

Dundee's voting U-turn led to rivals United and Robbie Neilson winning Championship title
Dundee’s voting U-turn led to rivals United and Robbie Neilson winning Championship title

“This is the only aspect of any proposal that helps Dundee FC in any way.

“As stated yesterday, reconstruction could help ensure the future of Scottish football as a sustainable and profitable one.

“After speaking to numerous clubs we believe that the appetite for reconstruction is there and the intention is to establish an immediate and focused working group to take on this task.

“We stated that the SPFL will have to accept and support the will of the members.  As you saw in the SPFL statement last night, they already have started this process.

“In conclusion, from a very poor situation we have gotten the best result for Dundee FC and for Scottish football as a whole.

“Of 42 teams, 34 have voted yes in a democratic ballot and for most, the important thing is the monies can be distributed and they can work on survival plans for their clubs.

“It is time now to return our focus on staying safe and planning for the future of Dundee FC.”

RAB DOUGLAS: My dealings with Scot Gardiner at Dundee weren’t pleasant…I’m not surprised he appeared to be spearheading ‘no’ campaign