Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Tee to Green: Golf Sixes not perfect, but…

England's Chris Wood and Andy Sullivan make their entrance on the 1st hole during day one of the Golf Sixes at the Centurion Club, St Albans.
England's Chris Wood and Andy Sullivan make their entrance on the 1st hole during day one of the Golf Sixes at the Centurion Club, St Albans.

Watching the European Tour’s inaugural Golf Sixes at the weekend, there was a strange but all too audible sound of creaking and groaning.

Maybe it was golf’s great figures spinning in their graves. Perhaps it was the game’s many traditionalists moving uncomfortably in their leather armchairs in clubhouse lounges across the country.

Perhaps it was some of us listening to Vernon Kay’s interview technique and wondering why the “presenter/personality” was needed at all. What next, Ant and Dec collaring Wayne Rooney as he comes off at half-time during Manchester United v Chelsea?

You’ll guess by that last comment I’m still to be wholly convinced about Golf Sixes, the brainchild of European Tour chief executive Keith Pelley.

There’s a big element of “aw shucks wasn’t this great” about the coverage, most of it bombarded from the Tour’s own media and social media departments and lacking any critical faculties whatsoever. Ditto Sky’s fawning coverage on TV.

The players seemed to love it, but I wouldn’t necessarily take great stock of that. They all love the Dunhill every year, which may be super fun to play in but is like root canal work – length root canal work – to watch.

But that’s as far as I’m going in being critical of Golf Sixes. The apparent tactic of the Tour of throwing in absolutely every idea anyone in their Wentworth offices came up with was obvious, but plenty of them stuck.

For a start, the basic format over two days to me seems the perfect shortened complement to the standard format of golf tournament.

No-one, it should be stressed again, is looking to replace the standard 72-hole “classic” version of the game with Golf Sixes or anything similar.

It’s meant to be a developmental hook, aimed at pure entertainment. Cricket’s Twenty 20 and rugby’s 7s aren’t taking over the standard forms of their games, at least not in most of our lifetimes.

But the shortened version can influence the classic one for good. Nobody doubts that T20 has actually made test cricket more entertaining with batsmen far more prepared these days to give it a lash, and 7s skills make for better and more open 15s rugby.

Similarly the shot clock innovation at Golf Sixes has definite implications for the 72-hole game – it better have. It was interesting to hear American Paul Petersen, enbarrassed to be the only player to fail to get a shot off before the proverbial buzzer, say it made him realise how much unnecessary time is taken on routine shots.

Richie Ramsay made the point that when the sun came out, the crowd followed and the Centurion Club was filled with kids. Let’s be honest, fully grown up golf is a daunting thing for young children, it looks complex and difficult and potentially embarrassing. Golf Sixes, in contrast, looks like a right good laugh.

It made me think about timing, and location. Golf has difficulty in its schedule of too many tournaments that are jammed around the majors and get lost in the flood of interest in those championships.

A Golf Sixes event the week after big tournaments in high summer would seem to be to be a no-brainer, taking advantage of good weather and also less stressed players.

It was pointed out that the English reserve meant the crowd didn’t quite take to the full razzamatazz but you’re not really going to convert a UK golf crowd to that overnight anyway.

My friend Matt Cooper on ESPN made the point that all the attendant stuff at Golf Sixes would go down a storm in less stuffy Germany or Scandanavia – prime territory for picking up new converts to the game. And anyway part of the reason for this is bringing in a new crowd who will lap all this stuff up.

The bottom line is that golf needs to do something to widen interest and particpation.

The “Kings of Distance” event in St Andrews last week stuck in my craw a little because – in my opinion – it glorifies a significant problem the game has, but it’s another attempt to take golf out of its narrowed and entrenched confines.

I’m okay with it on those grounds and certainly in favour of Golf Sixes. It’s far from perfect and it’ll probably need a few versions before they fine tune it.

But enough of it worked that they should keep trying. And you certainly can’t fault them for doing that.

Not that much of a difference

More traditionalists are beelin’ at this twitter popularity poll to determine which of four very presentable players get into the Shoprite LPGA Classic in June.

Our own Carly Booth, with her social media presence currently massively overshadowing her recent golfing achievements, is one of the four.

It’s really a beauty contest, which does not sit well with me or look great for the LPGA. But is it that much worse than the alternative, which is the unfair, arbitrary and sometimes almost corruptible sponsors’ invite?

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]