Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

THE BREAKDOWN, STEVE SCOTT: Rugby’s not gone soft, but high stakes of collisions mean it really needs to get softer

Ben Toolis gets treatment for a head knock playing for Scotland against Georgia last year.
Ben Toolis gets treatment for a head knock playing for Scotland against Georgia last year.

In the second Tri-Nations test between Australia and Argentina this month, Wallabies’ back rower Lukhan Salakaia-Loto was given a straight red card for hit on Argentina’s Santiago Grondona.

Repeated replays showed the incident quite clearly. Salakaia-Loto went in high – totally unnecessarily so – didn’t attempt to wrap his arms and his shoulder met Grondona’s chin with considerable force.

Referee Ben O’Keeffe and TMO Angus Gardner barely had to study the footage. “No mitigating circumstances” said O’Keeffe to Salakaia-Loto, brandishing as clear a straight red as you get.

Over on Twitter, however, some had a different view. “World rugby right now. Laugh out loud” tweeted former Glasgow and Scotland 10 Dan Parks, the last of a series of comments where he seemed to be suggesting the game had gone soft.

“Rugby has lost its way. Turn off” was followed by “Joke joke joke. Can’t believe this”. Those were posted before the Salakaia-Loto incident to be fair, but clearly referred to various contact situations in the game.

Ben O’Keeffe shows Lukhan Sakakaia-Loto the red card.

There’s some irony in this, given that Dan, for all his many virtues as a player, was never that fond of the physical aspect of the game. At least not when he was playing for the Warriors or his adopted nation.

‘Rugby’s gone soft’

But it underlines the attitudes of many to the increased – and still, increasingly dangerous – level and extent of forceful contact in our game. The “rugby’s going soft” brigade.

Yes, even the limited extent in which the force of the game’s collisions has been mitigated – requiring players to keep impacts away from the head, outlawing (successfully) tip-tackles, policing the contest for the ball in the air – is too much for some.

Steve Thompson playing in the 2011 Rugby World Cup.

This actually doesn’t bear too much relation to the class action suit raised by several former players suffering dementia issues against World Rugby, first reported by the Guardian. Ten former Scottish players are reportedly joining the group, according to my colleague Rob Robertson of the Daily Mail.

The heartbreaking testimony of former Lions and England hooker Steve Thompson, who now does not recall his moments of glory on the playing field and is has symptoms of early onset dementia, has shaken rugby to the core.

If the pattern of lawsuits by former players against American sporting bodies like the NFL and NHL along similar lines is followed, a considerable financial settlement is likely.

‘Collective redress’

It’s probable that World Rugby will seek to pull all actions together and the various unions will make collective redress through the worldwide body. That’s if it can be proven they were negligent, which is not a given.

This suit, although it requires attention, is already part of the game’s past. But if rugby is to survive as a contact sport, what form will it be in?

The mantra from coaches and governing bodies is with procedures now in place and greater awareness of concussion and impacts, elite rugby is safer than it was in Thompson’s time.

But the physical demands are greater, players are fitter, bigger and stronger, and the tactics mean there are countless more impact situations.

‘Brutality’

It’s even entered the accepted language of rugby. I was shocked a while back when one senior coach in Scotland talked about the need for more “brutality”. That and “winning collisions” – of course you have to be more brutal to win them – was a good thing.

Let’s take two examples of more recent times. In a Six Nations match against Wales a few years ago, Scotland’s Stuart Hogg felled a Welsh attacker and then leapt to his feet to contest the ball.

He exposed his neck and shoulders to Gethin Jenkins, who arrived at full pace from distance with all his 19 stones of momentum and made full-force contact to clear out Hogg.

Two weeks ago in Dublin, Hoggy again took a defensive position to try and steal possession, neck and shoulders exposed. He was cleared out with frightening force by two flying front-five forwards in Andrew Porter and Iain Henderson.

Hogg is a full-back and those instances stick in my mind probably because he’s Scotland’s highest profile player. But forwards are taking these kind of forceful “brutal” hits repeatedly, and in midweek training as well.

The growing evidence is that as well as the concussive episodes, repeated impacts are debilitating to future mental health. Heading in football is also being examined in this way.

‘The claim that modern rugby is safe is hogwash’

Therefore the claims of head coaches and unions that modern rugby is safe is hogwash – they don’t know for sure. And a class action suit in ten years’ time won’t have any ignorance alibi.

That could be an existential threat to rugby as a game. We have to start to sort out a way to play that makes it safer.

Modern rugby’s not gone soft, despite what the ranters claim. But it’s really got to get softer.