Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Chris Tarrant brands Millionaire cheat Charles Ingram ‘a rotter, cad and bandit’

Chris Tarrant arrives at Southwark Crown Court for the trial in 2003 (Stefan Rousseau/PA)
Chris Tarrant arrives at Southwark Crown Court for the trial in 2003 (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

Chris Tarrant has said Charles Ingram was “a rotter, a cad and a bandit”, adding he has “beef” with TV drama Quiz for casting doubt over his conviction.

The former army major and his wife Diana were found guilty of cheating their way to the top prize on ITV game show Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?

A lawyer for the couple said they are planning to appeal against their conviction.

The drama about the scandal starring Matthew Macfadyen and Sian Clifford as the couple, Michael Jibson as co-conspirator Tecwen Whittock and Michael Sheen as Tarrant, concluded on ITV on Wednesday night.

Asked what he thought of the show, which was written by James Graham, Tarrant told Chris Moyles on Radio X: “It was very well made wasn’t it? It was actually very well done but it is a drama, it’s not factual.

“So most of those conversations were made up because that’s what playwrights do.

“I mean the bottom line is he’s a rotter and a cad and a bandit and he was guilty. No question in my mind at all that he was guilty.”

He added: “And there were so many things in there that they didn’t include.

“My beef with it is that they did a very strange but very convincing defence QC – that woman, Helen McCrory – a very good defence wind-up but they did not do any prosecution wind-up.

“Now, in any court of law the prosecution does the last bit and when the major and his wife and Tecwen were on the actual court case, the prosecution guy did the most brilliant sum-up, bringing all the strands in – the coughing and the bleepers and all the stuff – and went to the jury and they went ‘guilty, guilty, guilty’.

“They didn’t do that last night at all, they just stopped on her, and you’re going ‘oh yeah, I think he might be … oh poor bloke, poor little man – all that – maybe he’s innocent’.

“I think it was – that bit was a bit of production company skulduggery basically. I mean, they wanted you to think ‘blimey I don’t think he was guilty’.”

Remembering the night Ingram won in 2001, Tarrant said: “I’ve always said, I saw nothing. But the studio that night was like a madhouse.

“People were screaming and gasping just because he was so, you know … he’s a serving British Army Major who’s on, I don’t know, £30k a year, rented accommodation or whatever, and he’s going ‘oh yes £500,000, let’s risk it, let’s play’ and all this and you think: ‘Why would you do that?’

“The studio was like a madhouse. People were screaming, people were coughing everywhere because people always cough in studios so I didn’t hear Tecwen. Afterwards I had to sit through the floor squad the next day and go through the tapes and it’s like ‘oh my god, what is going on’.”

He added: “I think a lot of people today will be waking up going ‘oh that poor major, I think they’ve done him up’.

“We wouldn’t – the police prosecuted him, we didn’t. At the time I think we were getting audiences of something like 13 or 14 million. We sold it to 132 countries around the world – America, Australia, India, etc – so why would we go out on a limb to try to prosecute one of these guys?

“Of course we thought he was guilty, no question. And nothing has changed my mind, to be honest. It (Quiz) was very well done, though.”