Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Reliability Index survey finds Far Eastern cars more reliable

Post Thumbnail

Japanese and Korean makes are the best bet for used car buyers who value reliability, according to new figures.

What Car? and warranty specialist Warranty Direct’s annual reliability study shows cars from European brands fail most often although they are also cheaper to fix.

The study is based on Warranty Direct’s 50,000 live policies on cars of between three to eight years of age.

Honda tops the standings for an unprecedented sixth year in a row, with a failure rate of just 9%.

All the top 10 manufacturers come from either Japan or Korea.

Land Rover is the least reliable brand, with 55% of its upmarket vehicles suffering faults in a 12-month period.

Alfa Romeo (46%), Renault (45%) and Saab (43%) all European brands are the next most breakdown-prone manufacturers.

The top two European brands are Skoda and Smart in 11th and 12th respectively.

Only they prevent an even stronger showing for Far Eastern manufacturers, by nudging ahead of Daewoo.’Disparity’Warranty Direct compiles the data for www.reliabilityindex.com, taking into account repair costs, age, mileage and rate of failure.

The What Car? and Warranty Direct annual study surveys manufacturers according to the number of faults in a 12-month period alone.

What Car? editor Chas Hallett said, “This year’s study is a stark reminder of the disparity in reliability between Far Eastern brands, which dominate the top 10, and European brands, which contribute the bulk of the bottom 10.”

Out of the manufacturers covered, Porsche was the most expensive to repair at an average cost of £690, followed by Mazda and Jeep, which cost £463 and £438 respectively.

Fiat, Renault and Ford models cost the least to repair, at around £250 on average.

European cars make up seven of the cheapest 10 brands to fix.

Further differences between European and Far Eastern manufacturers can be found in the problems they suffer.Luxury problemsA third of faults found on European cars are down to electrical malfunctions, while owners of Japanese Subaru, Lexus and Suzuki cars report the most axle and suspension issues.

The most reliable (chance of fault in 12 months):1 Honda (9%) 2 Toyota (14%) 3 Suzuki (15%) 4 Lexus (15%) 5 Mitsubishi (15%) 6 Mazda (16%) 7 Subaru (17%) 8 Hyundai (20%) 9 Kia (21%) 10 Nissan (22%)Least reliable (chance of fault in 12 months):1 Land Rover (55%) 2 Alfa Romeo (46%) 3 Renault (45%) 4 Saab (43%) 5 Jeep (42%) 6 Chrysler (38%) 7 MG (37%) 8 Mercedes (34%) 9 Vauxhall (34%) 10 Audi (33%).Cheapest average repair costs:1 Fiat (£241) 2 Renault (£242) 3 Ford (£253) 4 Suzuki (£255) 5 Peugeot (£257)Most expensive average repair costs:1 Porsche (£689) 2 Mazda (£462) 3 Jeep (£437) 4 Mercedes-Benz (£428) 5 Mitsubishi (£427)