Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Alex Salmond’s oil claims rejected as ‘too good to be true’

Alex Salmond’s oil claims rejected as ‘too good to be true’

Scotland’s First Minister has admitted two-thirds of future oil revenues would not make it into the country’s coffers.

Alex Salmond came under fire for claiming the oil left in the North Sea is worth “£300,000 a head for every man, woman and child in Scotland in terms of the wholesale value”.

When questioned by The Courier on the issue, Mr Salmond said that, over the next 50 years, “we could see about 24 billion barrels of oil and gas recovered from the waters around Scotland, worth in the region of £1.5 trillion.”

He added: “Some of that goes in terms of the cost of exploration and development, some goes in terms of company profits, some goes in terms of revenues.

“Around a third comes to the Government in terms of revenues after the cost of exploration and production, etc.”

However, he insisted Scotland’s economy doesn’t rely on oil and gas, adding: “It’s not the basis of our economy it’s a bonus.”

Alistair Darling, chairman of the Better Together campaign group, called for the £300,000-a-head claim to be withdrawn.

He said: “Scots know that if something sounds too good to be true, it isn’t true. For Alex Salmond to treat us like fools by deliberately confusing the wholesale value of oil with the amount we would actually raise through tax is fundamentally dishonest.”

Mr Salmond also claimed a “giant hole” has been punctured in the UK independent forecaster’s reputation over oil revenue predictions after it emerged the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) based its most recent predictions on figures from Westminster’s Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC).

He added: “The OBR should not be taking DECC figures because that removes the argument that they are somehow independent from Government.”

A UK Government insider told The Courier the OBR, whose revenue figures have consistently been lower than the Scottish Government’s, was free to choose whatever sources it liked.

The comments came as Mr Salmond visited Montrose Harbour to launch a paper which said the Scottish Government has no plans to increase taxes on the oil industry and committed to formal consultation before any changes are made to the fiscal regime.

An expert commission, chaired by leading industry figure Melfort Campbell, will be appointed next month to consider options for the implementation of the paper’s key principles.

Aberdeen University oil economist Professor Alex Kemp welcomed the paper and described UK Government predictions for remaining oil production as “very low”.

He added: “The Scottish Government’s commitment to formal consultation with the industry in advance of any reforms will provide the reassurance and predictability that the sector requires.”