Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Proposed Stannergate turbine meeting abandoned by council

Post Thumbnail

Plans to hold a meeting with the developer proposing to build two wind turbines at Dundee”s port before a planning application has been submitted have been abandoned, at least temporarily, by the city council.

Forth Energy has said it intends to submit a planning application to the council for two turbines up to 127 metres in height.

It is also looking to build a biomass plant at the port but that would not have to go through the council’s planning process and would be determined by the Scottish Government.

At the suggestion of Councillor Rod Wallace, convener of the development quality committee, a pre-application meeting with Forth Energy was arranged by officials for May 17. This was to give councillors a factual briefing on the proposals for the wind turbines and the biomass plant.

However, Councillor Fraser Macpherson and Lord Provost John Letford said they would not attend such a meeting if it dealt with the turbines as they were concerned that it could be seen to compromise the impartiality of the planning process and make the public think that Forth Energy was being given an unfair advantage over objectors.

In light of the points raised, a meeting was held involving Mr Wallace, chief executive David Dorward, city development director Mike Galloway and the council’s senior legal official Patricia McIlquham.

The outcome of the meeting was that a briefing on the biomass plant will still be held but it has not been decided whether or not to go ahead with a similar one for the turbines.

While the council is a statutory consultee for the biomass proposal and will be asked for its view, it is not involved in making a decision about whether or not it should go ahead.

As Forth Energy has announced that it will be holding a two-day public consultation on the biomass plant proposal in the Overgate Centre on May 20 and 21 it has been agreed to put back the briefing for councillors on that issue until May 26.

A council spokesman said, “The briefing for elected members has been postponed until after the public have had the opportunity to hear first hand from Forth Energy about the plans on the biomass plant.

“Elected members will get exactly the same information about the biomass plant as the general public.”

He said the council would determine any planning application which comes forward for the wind turbines.Later decisionAny decision on a future briefing for councillors about the turbines will be taken at a later stage.

Mr Wallace said he would still like to have a briefing on the turbines as he believed it was in the spirit of the new planning legislation.

He acknowledged some members had concerns about such a meeting and it was up to them to decide whether to attend or not.

Mr Macpherson welcomed the fact that the matter had been reconsidered and that the briefing which is to be held will deal only with the biomass plant.

If it was decided to also hold a briefing on the wind turbines, he added, the concerns he has raised would remain and he would not attend.

Earlier, the lord provost spoke about his unease at the idea of a briefing on the turbines and said he would not be going if it went ahead.

Mr Letford said he had sought advice from legal officials at the council when Forth Energy ran a two-day meeting in Craigiebank Church to outline proposals for the turbines to the local community.

He was advised not to attend that event and he saw no difference between it and the briefing.

“I am sure, if this meeting takes place, it will send out the wrong message to the public and it would appear to be favouring developers before it (the application) came to committee,” he said.