Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Councillor says £58,400 for Whitfield cafe project is hard to swallow

Councillor Brian Gordon outside The Crescent in Whitfield.
Councillor Brian Gordon outside The Crescent in Whitfield.

Dundee City Council’s decision to pour almost £60,000 into a cafe business in a new council property has stirred up a local councillor.

Brian Gordon is demanding to know why the sum is being spent on the social enterprise project at The Crescent, the £6.8 million life services building which was opened last month in Whitfield.

The money is to fit out the cafe but he does not see why the cafe operator’s needs could not have been factored into the original plans to save the cash-strapped council from spending the extra £58,400.

He is also asking why the council is paying for the re-fit when tenants of other units in the building were told they would have to pay for their own changes.

He has other questions about the social enterprise running the cafe and whether they have experience with commercial ventures.

“The Crescent is only weeks old and is for social work, healthcare, library, cafe and retail facilities,” Mr Gordon said.

“It is an important part of Whitfield’s regeneration and it has cost the council almost £7 million, yet we have just had a report to committee saying we need to spend another £58,400 fitting out its cafe.

“I’ve seen correspondence with other tenants there which said they would have to pay for any refit they wanted to their units, so why is the cafe being treated differently?

“Why also could the cafe’s needs not be incorporated in the original building? Who is going to run the cafe and do they have experience in this type of venture?

“I’m hearing that the local history group are being squeezed into a smaller space because of the cafe and they may not be able to continue. I want to know what exactly is going on here.”

He has raised the issue with Mike Galloway, director of city development, and been told that securing a suitable community enterprise operator has taken some effort.

The re-fit involved the minor modification of taking away a small part of a wall, and the director said the requirements of the social enterprise have only recently been confirmed.

The drawings used in the tender process were only indicative until the confirmed tenant was able to clarify requirements.

Mr Galloway said the cafe should be fully operational with a thriving community enterprise up and running in September.

In response to Mr Gordon’s concern about apparent differential treatment, a spokesman for the city council said: “We will respond directly to Councillor Gordon in due course.”