Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Kinness Burn flood prevention doesn’t go far enough for some

Post Thumbnail

Flood mitigation measures for a St Andrews burn received a mixed reaction from the residents whose homes they are designed to protect.

Fife Council’s north-east Fife area committee agreed to press ahead with a £150,000 scheme to reduce the risk of the Kinness Burn bursting its banks.

A licence is to be sought from the Scottish Environment Protection Agency (SEPA) before work can begin on the reduction of silt berms and bank repairs.

Many residents want the complete removal of the berms but have been told SEPA is unlikely to allow this.

Following the committee meeting Graeme and Moira Weir, of Kinnessburn Road, said they wanted to see the berms gone completely.

Mr Weir said, “We are left with the impression that wildlife is more important than people.”

Dr Robert Grundy, who owns a house in Fleming Place, said, “This is probably the best they (the council) can get away with. Anything more drastic probably would not have satisfied the regulations.

“As long as what they describe actually happens and provided the maintenance is carried out in the way described, I think this is a step forward.”

Ian Cumming, who lives 100 yards from the burn, questioned the need to protect the berms.

“There is no life on these berms apart from plants, which are causing the flooding,” he said.

It is proposed to reduce five berms which create bottlenecks between Dempster Court Bridge and Greenside Place Bridge by 50% and remove unstable berms.

While another berm is of particular concern, officers told councillors reduction of those upstream meant water flow would improve and that they would carry out as much work on it as SEPA would allow.

Banks and timber revetments are also to be upgraded and a programme of regular maintenance embarked upon. This option was recommended by officers as the most feasible and cost-effective.

Complete removal of the berms was rejected as this was deemed likely to have a significant detrimental impact on the ecology of the burn, which is used by birds and otters, and therefore unlikely to be permitted by SEPA.

After councillors approved the scheme, committee chairman Andrew Arbuckle, said, “This may not be as much as some people would like but it’s the result of an expensive and comprehensive study of what is possible.

“We are constrained not only financially but by legislation.”

An application is to be submitted to SEPA next month and if a licence is granted by the end of June it is anticipated work will begin in August or September and be complete by September.

Options in relation to the smaller footbridge at Dempster Terrace, which is not owned by the council but is known to contribute occasionally to flooding, are also to be investigated further.