Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Late bid to block Fife Council’s care homes plan defeated

Post Thumbnail

A last-ditch bid to stop the privatisation of care homes in Fife failed as the council approved measures to help plug a £127 million gap in its capital investment plan.

Fife’s SNP/Lib Dem administration approved steps to tackle the massive shortfall identified over the lifetime of its plan, which included taking back the £40 million previously earmarked for replacing ageing care homes.

The £40 million had been set aside to build up to five new homes, but the council has since decided not to proceed with the replacement programme and is moving towards providing care through the private or not-for-profit sector.

Labour councillors had hoped to block the changes to the capital plan and, by doing so, force the council to commit to a mixed provision of care, but they were ultimately outvoted.

Measures outlined on Thursday will effectively cut the council’s estimated funding gap of £127 million to just £27 million, although councillors were warned capital plan costs could increase further over the coming years as cost pressures grow and the demands for new projects escalate.

Council leader Peter Grant said, “We’re still talking about not far short of £1 billion to be spent on capital projects in Fife, £900 million and odd of which there’s no argument about. That’s an indication that we did get it right.

“The focus will inevitably be on the things that are not happening but let’s not lose sight of the things that are happening.

“This is not the capital plan that I would put forward if it was entirely my decision there has to be a bit of give and take and nobody is going to get everything they wanted.

“But it is a plan I think recognises where investment has to be made and recognises where benefits can be achieved without the same level of investment on our part.

“If someone else is willing to do something to an acceptable standard, we should let them do it.”

Opposition councillors proposed keeping £20 million in the plan to replace or refurbish council-run homes, calling the £40 million earmarked by the administration a “guestimate”.

Continued…

Labour’s David Ross said, “We need to retain a mix of provision and we’re proposing to put at least £20 million towards the refurbishment and replacement of care homes. We think the costs have been overestimated and they could be procured for less than £40 million.

“By proper partnership with the not-for-profit sector and the development of care co-operatives we could attract match funding to substantially increase the investment being put in. We’re convinced this would allow us to retain good standards of care, keep control over those standards and ensure good training and consistency of staff which is absolutely vital for the people in our homes.”

But Tim Brett, chairman of social work and health, replied, “Labour are proposing £20 million and that may procure three-and-a-bit homes, so I’m not sure how they propose to go forward in the longer term.

“I note Labour also talks about refurbishment. I would remind them that we did look in detail at this and the advice we had was that our homes could not be refurbished to the standards required without significantly reducing the number of places that would be involved.”

Labour also wanted to establish a £5 million Communities Investment Fund, retain £3.65 million in the plan for works at Dysart Harbour, and allocate extra money for roads and paths, also asking for reviews into the school estate, fleet transport and IT. However, the proposal was rejected by 14 votes to six.

As well as the £40 million care home cash, the council will make £35 million available by adding a ninth and 10th year to the initial plan, extending it to 2019/20, and expects to bring in an extra £14 million by selling its assets. It had been feared the downturn would restrict the income it generates from selling assets, but revised estimates suggest the council will benefit more as the economy recovers.

In addition, the Scottish Futures Trust is expected to allocate £11 million in funding to the new Auchmuty High School in Glenrothes.

With a review of the capital plan identifying more than £105 million of emerging needs over the life of the plan, proposals worth £79.5 million were also put on the back burner.

Just over £87 million of savings had been identified but the SNP/Lib Dem motion proposed to leave nine specific projects in the plan, including £2 million for the Levenmouth rail link, £2.2 million towards removing huts in schools and £300,000 for the Cowdenbeath bus scheme.