Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Controversial East Neuk turbines given the go-ahead

Expert studies were carried out regarding the safety of a 65-metre turbine in the East Neuk area.
Expert studies were carried out regarding the safety of a 65-metre turbine in the East Neuk area.

Fears that the erection of three 67-metre wind turbines in the East Neuk could cause turbulence which impacts on the safety of pilots using a nearby airfield have been dismissed “beyond reasonable doubt”, with the proposals being narrowly approved by councillors.

Concerns had been raised by campaigners regarding the potential impact of the turbines proposed for countryside at Bonerbo, Balmonth and Drumrack farms and their proximity to Kingsmuir Airfield.

This followed a recent ruling by a Scottish Government reporter, who stated he could not rule out that turbulence from turbines could have a detrimental effect on aircraft taking off and landing.

Councillors have been told that further expert studies, commissioned by the applicant in the wake of the reporter’s appeal decision, now showed that the proposed turbines “will not cause any significant turbulence at the airfield” and that any effect is likely to be “negligible compared with existing background levels of turbulence, which the users of the airfield already contend with and account for”.

In a report to Fife Council’s North-East Fife planning committee, service manager Alastair Hamilton said Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) policy and guidelines on wind turbines stated that development may have an impact.

However, in this particular case, the Ministry of Defence, BAA and NATS air traffic control have stated they have no objection.

The CAA has been consulted with regards to the additional information provided by the applicant and advise that it “would not wish to support or discredit” the research as it does not yet have the results of independently commissioned CAA research.

Mr Hamilton said the information was now sufficient for council planners to recommend approval on a “reasonable basis” despite not having a third party to corroborate the applicant’s research.

He said: “While Fife Council has no means to independently corroborate the technical reports submitted in support of this application…Fife Council is satisfied that reasonable steps have been taken to provide a detailed, site-specific analysis… it is considered that sufficient, relevant and appropriate analysis has been undertaken to enable Fife Council to determine the application.”

Howe of Fife councillor David MacDiarmid, seconded by Councillor Andy Heer, moved refusal.

Mr MacDiarmid said he was “not convinced” at the air safety assertions and noted the application was also contrary to TayPlan policy on flight paths.

Mr Heer backed these concerns. He said: “If I was coming in to land and the pilot was told that the CAA was not sure about whether the airfield was safe, then I wouldn’t be happy. I think we’ve got to be 100% clear with aviation safety.”

East Neuk and Landward councillor Elizabeth Riches, seconded by fellow East Neuk member Donald MacGregor, moved approval.

Mrs Riches said that with aviation it was not always possible to say beyond all reasonable doubt that something was safe.

There were issues regarding the cumulative impact of other windfarm applications in the area but she said the application had to be taken at face value.

The application by Messrs Stevenson, Watson and Brunton, c/o of Bonerbo Farm, Anstruther, was approved by eight votes to six.

Fife Council planners say the proposed turbines represent a renewable energy proposal that would count towards the Scottish Government’s targets of achieving 100% of Scotland’s electricity from renewable sources by 2020.

With regard its impact on the natural and built environment, it is considered that the proposed scheme could be accommodated within the landscape and would have no adverse impact on the historic built environment at this locale.