Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Madras College families facing yet more uncertainty after Kilrymont plan put on ice

Post Thumbnail

A new single-site Madras College in St Andrews will now not be completed until August 2017 at the earliest.

The timetable follows the decision of senior Fife councillors to further review site options rather than press ahead with the controversial redevelopment of the existing building at Kilrymont Road.

The inability to meet an existing construction deadline of August 2016 was confirmed on Thursday by Fife Council’s executive director for education and learning, Kenneth Greer. He told councillors that anything but pushing ahead with the Kilrymont redevelopment proposal immediately would lead to further delay.

Whilst Kilrymont could still emerge as the only option, the uncertain timetable means that after more than a decade of debate none of the existing pupils at Madras are likely to enjoy the benefits of the completed new school.

At the inaugural meeting of Fife Council’s new executive committee in Fife House, councillors discussed two options to press ahead with the re-modelling of the crumbling 1960s-built Kilrymont campus or to consult the community again on different site options.

Moving that a further review of site options be implemented, including Station Park and the university-owned ”pond site” at North Haugh, Fife Council administration leader Labour councillor Alex Rowley said: ”We have to get this right for St Andrews and Tay Bridgehead and the future generations who deserve a state-of-the-art building for their education.

”It’s vital that we have the backing of the local community for this important decision. That’s why we’ve decided to make sure all the alternatives are reviewed so that we get the right site for a new Madras that is fit for purpose. We will be taking swift action on this issue and speaking to all the relevant parties, including St Andrews University, as quickly as possible to move this forward.”

Independent Cupar councillor Bryan Poole, who is responsible for education on the new executive committee, said the process would move forward ”as quickly as possible” but he did not want to ”get tied down with dates”.

He added: ”We are committed to ending the uncertainty for the local community, teachers and pupils and taking a decision that is right for St Andrews and Tay Bridgehead.

”Given the background to this project we will want to take the school and wider community with us at every stage of this project and find the right solution as soon as it’s practical to do so.”

Tim Brett, the leader of the Fife Liberal Democrats and Tay Bridgehead councillor, seconded the Labour leader’s motion for site reviews.

He said it was ”unfortunate” there appeared to be a split in the St Andrews community over Kilrymont.

It was important that discussions moved forward in an ”open and transparent way” and a clear timetable was required, he said.

But leader of the opposition and former leader of the administration, SNP councillor Peter Grant, said it was unlikely that the council would get more than 50% of the population of St Andrews to agree about anything.

It had been the previous administration’s strong aspiration to build a new ‘super-Madras’ on the Wester Langlands site in conjunction with St Andrews University, but when this fell through last August, Kilrymont had been viewed as the most practical and cost-effective alternative.

Mr Grant expressed concern that the Labour motion would not clarify the alternative sites being considered or commit to a timetable for completion. However, Mr Grant’s motion, backed by fellow SNP councillor Brian Goodall, that a commitment be given to August 2016 completion and August 2017 at the latest was rejected by 13 votes to three.