Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Pitlochry prefers students’ visions of town development

Post Thumbnail

A survey undertaken by Pitlochry Conservation Society has revealed an overwhelming antipathy towards controversial development plans.

Less than 1% of the 190 respondents gave the thumbs-up to the proposal by Upland Developments, which includes a motel complex and a mini-supermarket.

The survey was completed during a presentation held last month by graduates of Glasgow’s Mackintosh School of Architecture, where they showcased their two alternative proposals.

They asked the 300-strong audience to evaluate each of the three schemes in relation to four criteria community life, local commerce, town character and imaginative design.

The original plans scored between 1% and 3% in most of the categories and failed to gain any response at all for adding anything to the character of Pitlochry.

However, the graduates’ “town square” options were viewed in a more positive light, with proposals for a Bank House Square emerging as the clear favourite, receiving 71% approval.

Local woman Helen McDade said, “I feel the architecture graduates did an excellent job within the remit given.

“They identified that the Bank House and the surrounding site are absolutely critical to the town’s appeal to locals and visitors alike and that it could provide a central focus with a public space and footpaths following the Moulin Burn.”

Their plans would see the Bank House building kept as a central feature, with a lower density of buildings, landscaped gardens, concealed parking and new pedestrian walkways that would allow locals and visitors to move through the town to Bonnethill Road, the Town Hall and Atholl Road without encountering traffic.

Finally, a higher density site that would see the demolition of the Bank House, as well as the enhanced walking routes, attracted around 28% approval.

Following these results, the society hopes that director of Upland Developments David Cameron will enter discussions over alternative options.

Chairman James Tyrell said, “We have proven that we are not against development itself, but it simply has to be right for the town.

“Upland Developments owns the site and without planning approval it is worth little.”

He added, “It really is in Mr Cameron’s interest to start a dialogue with the town.

“If Perth and Kinross Council’s development control committee rejects his proposal and he then goes for appeal, we will go further with the matter.

“It is unbelievable that such an ill-advised project could ever have been conceived for this key conservation site at Pitlochry’s heart.”