Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Perthshire cowshed application row goes to ministers

Perthshire cowshed application row goes to ministers

A Perthshire farmer who has been ordered to tear down an unauthorised cowshed claims his livestock are being put at risk.

Enforcement action is being taken against James Forbes after he built a barn for cattle and sheep on his land near Glenfarg.

The steading was being used in a field at Duncrievie despite two failed attempts to secure planning permission.

Last year councillors threw out a retrospective application, claiming the shed would lead to an “unacceptable level of noise” for neighbours.

Now, Mr Forbes is battling the order with an appeal to Scottish ministers.

In a statement lodged with the Scottish Government’s Directorate for Planning and Environmental Appeals, an agent for the farm argues that the council’s demand to have the shed removed within 28 days is “not reasonable”.

A spokesman said: “In particular, the appellants seek to challenge the enforcement notice on the basis primarily in relation to the welfare effects on the animals which are housed in the shed.

“There are presently 22 cows and a number of sheep all utilising the shed. Cattle is housed during the wintertime and will be in the shed between mid-November and May.

“There is no other place where the appellants can adequately locate their animals and their health and wealth would be compromised without utilising this shed.”

In a report on last year’s planning bid, council officer Andy Baxter stated: “There is a clear potential for noise nuisance to occur even if the shed was to be used for purely general agricultural purposes (excluding livestock) which the applicant Mr Forbes has suggested will be the case.”

The erection of the shed has angered building firm GS Brown Construction. In his letter to planning appeal officers, chairman Geoff Brown explained that the company won planning permission to build four houses near the site.

“At the time the consent was issued, the site was a highly-marketable location, but its potential has been effectively nullified by the erection within the adjacent land of a cattle shed.”

He added: “If a cattle shed had been erected before we had made our planning application for the four houses we believe that our application would have been refused due to its proximity to a ‘bad neighbour’ use.”

Mr Brown said he is backing the council’s enforcement action to have the shed removed.

No one at Mr Forbes’ farm was available to comment yesterday.

A reporter appointed by Scottish ministers to investigate the case is expected to issue a decision in January.