Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Couple ordered to remove “smelly” dogs from their Perth home

Building exterior of Perth Sheriff Court, Tay Street, Perth.
Building exterior of Perth Sheriff Court, Tay Street, Perth.

A couple ordered to remove “smelly” dogs from their Perth flat have vowed to bring the pets home as soon as they are able.

Audrey Gibb and Sarah Smith were ordered to remove the pack of dogs by a court after their neighbours raised Annoying Creatures action against them.

Perth’s Justice of the Peace Court was told that the couple were causing a nuisance to nearby residents by keeping five dogs in a two-bedroom flat at 66 Dunsinane Drive in Perth.

Anna Kasperowicz and Krzysztof Papiez, who live at number 64 and have their flat up for sale, were granted an order forcing the couple to keep the dogs out of the property for a nine- month period.

Ms Gibb said the animals were well cared for and denied that the animals barked for “prolonged” periods of time.

She said: “They said my dogs make a noise 24/7, which isn’t true because I’m in all day and Sarah is in in the evenings the dogs don’t bark while there’s someone in the house.

“When they move the dogs will be coming back. My other neighbours say they’ve not heard the dogs making any noise.”

She also disputed the claim that the dogs created a strong smell.

“How can they tell what the smell is when they’ve never been in my house?” she said.

The complainers were unavailable for comment but in their petition to the court, Ms Kasperowicz and Mr Papiez stated: “The confinement of the dogs indoors creates an obnoxious smell which is particularly unpleasant during warm weather.

“The smell permeates the complainers’ home and windows must be kept closed…

“They are kept in a two-bedroom flat. They are occasionally released into the garden for toileting. They do not exercise the dogs and they are kept in restricted conditions.

“The dogs bark for significant periods of time most days, and frequently at unsociable times. As a result of prolonged barking episodes, the sleep pattern of the complainers is disrupted.

“The complainers are unable to hear the sound from the television when the dogs are barking and they cannot hear telephone communications.”

After hearing representations in the case, JP Stewart Clark found in favour of the complainants and ordered Gibb and Smith to remove the dogs from the property immediately and told them that the order would remain in place for nine months.

The court was told that if the order was breached it could be reported to the police and the couple could be prosecuted and fined up to £1,000.