Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Perthshire mum’s anger after watchdog clears controversial school pupil survey

Children as young as nine were surveyed as part of the Evidence2Success project.
Children as young as nine were surveyed as part of the Evidence2Success project.

A controversial council survey which asked young school pupils about drug taking and sexual issues did not breach data protection rules, according to a powerful watchdog.

The Evidence2Success project “well-being survey” was referred to the Information Commissioner by a horrified Perthshire parent. She said she will appeal and is even considering taking the issue to European level.

The survey provoked outrage due to the perceived explicit and intrusive nature of some of the questions asked of children as young as nine.

There was also alarm among parents who said they had not consented to their children taking part. Perth and Kinross Council and NHS Tayside undertook the £225,000 probe of pupil issues to better target future resources.

They said the answers would be anonymous and insisted all parents had been able to opt out.

Following a three-month investigation, the Information Commissioner, which can fine bodies up to £500,000, ruled the local authority had done nothing wrong.

Senior policy officer Maureen Falconer said: “There is no strong indication that Perth and Kinross Council has failed to comply with its obligations under the (Data Protection) Act in this case.

“This is because the data derived from the survey has been fully anonymised and cannot identify any one individual. As a result, the data is not personal data for the purposes of the act and it does not apply.”

Deborah Thomas has appealed the decision, calling it “deeply wrong.”

She said: “Many parents did not receive an opt-out consent form and children were not afforded enough time in the classroom setting to consider their options to withdraw or discuss it with a parent or guardian.

“There is something deeply wrong and it is particularly worrying as it concerns the data of very young subjects, many of them ‘looked after’ and with additional needs and challenges.”

The appeal rests with the assistant information commissioner but Mrs Thomas is already considering approaching the European Data Protection Supervisor. The 24-page survey quizzed more than 8,600 pupils on a range of topics.

Parents and carers were supposed to receive a letter at home giving their children the chance to opt out of participation, while a further opportunity was to be given to children before they began.

Questions included whether youngsters have attended school “drunk, on drugs or high” and had numerous questions about named drugs.

Pupils were asked whether “all in all, I am inclined to think that I am a failure” and whether “life is not worth it”.

A questionnaire for 14 to 16-year-olds asked about their sexual habits, including graphic descriptions of what is considered “sexual intercourse”. Complaints were made to the local authority when the nature of the questions became clear.

A spokesman for Perth and Kinross Council said: “The council was always confident that the methodology used in collecting this data was sound.”