Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Creag a’ Bhaird windfarm scheme blocked by councillors

A turbine under construction at the Griffin windfarm.
A turbine under construction at the Griffin windfarm.

A major windfarm project has been rejected by councillors following a considerable backlash from residents.

Renewable specialists Force 9 Energy had proposed to install 13 turbines at land near Aberfeldy, close to the massive SSE-operated Griffin development.

The planning bid for the multi-million-pound Creag a’ Bhaird scheme came up against widespread opposition from locals, community councils and conservation groups, however.

Perth and Kinross Council received nearly 100 letters and emails calling for the plan for land near a popular tourist trail to be scrapped.

Now members of the development management committee have unanimously ruled against the scheme, on the basis that it would have a detrimental impact on the surrounding area.

Opponents argued the turbines would be noisy, unsightly and could lead to a downturn in tourist numbers.

They pointed out that, when the much larger Griffin development was approved, four of its turbines were removed to limit the impact on nearest residents.

Objector John Anderson, who lives less than a mile from the site, said Force 9’s plan would reintroduce those missing masts and many more.

“This would be one of the most intrusive windfarms on a viable rural community I have ever seen,” he said.

Andrew Smith, of Force 9, addressed the committee and argued that planning officers who had prepared a report on the project had “overstated its environmental impact” and called for their comments to be disregarded.

When asked if felling trees to clear the area for Creag a’ Bhaird would make Griffin more visible, he said that the trees were part of a commercial operation and would be felled anyway.

Mr Smith said it was significant that Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH) had not made a formal objection to the plan.

Councillor John Kellas said: “We have fought hard to preserve this tourist route, which is in a very attractive part of Perthshire.

“We need to continue to do so and stop it turning into an industrialised zone.”

In his report, which was agreed by the committee, development quality manager Nick Brian states: “The windfarm has a significant and unacceptable visual impact on residential, recreational and tourist receptors.”

Objector Nan Johnston, who spoke to the committee on behalf of protesters in Dunkeld and Birnam, said she was pleased with the decision and hoped Force 9 would not appeal it.

“Although there may be some short-term construction jobs created, they will not compensate for the potential loss of long-term employment due to the adverse impact windfarm developments are having on local businesses,” she said.

“For example, increased HGV traffic is preventing clients and/or deliveries reaching business premises in a timely manner.”

She added that the turbines may have led to a downturn in trade for guesthouse owners and holiday accommodation providers, who rely on tourism.

Details of the scheme were first revealed at a series of public consultation meetings two years ago.

Among its opponents is the Perth-based John Muir Trust, which campaigns to preserve Scotland’s wild land.

A spokesman said: “We are seriously concerned that the proposed development, if approved, would be visually intrusive and significantly and adversely impact on this wild landscape.

“Highland Perthshire in general, and Aberfeldy and Dunkeld in particular, rely very heavily on tourism for employment and this should not be put at further risk.”

Already a subscriber? Sign in