Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish election campaign: ‘No more project fear’, says Tory leader Ruth Davidson

Ruth Davidson launches her party's Holyrood election manifesto in Glasgow.
Ruth Davidson launches her party's Holyrood election manifesto in Glasgow.

Ruth Davidson has unveiled a campaign to save Britain in a bid to mobilise Scotland’s two million No voters.

The Scottish Conservative leader attacked the Better Together campaign she was part of by vowing there would be “no more project fear” from the new movement.

But Ms Davidson was attacked by her opponents for offering “no policies, no vision and no change” in a document which concedes next month’s election to the SNP on its second page.

She said: “If the SNP carries out its threat to launch its summer initiative for independence, then the clear pro-UK case [must be] made as well. And it’s a case that must be made far, far better.

“Too often over recent years our case for the Union has simply been a matter of picking at the flaws of independence, of dissecting the numbers, rubbishing the projections or disputing proposals.

“Easy, but ultimately not enough. Too often we have failed to make the case for why our family of nations works.

“And the legacy from the referendum is that we on the pro-UK side allowed ‘No thanks’ to be seen as a constant negative.

“If we are to counter the SNP’s mis-information, this must change. The case for independence is dead. The case for the Union must now be made.”

The Tories’ “programme for opposition” is based around 10 pledges, including an additional £300 million to improve mental health treatment, a triple lock on NHS funding, scrapping controversial Named Persons legislation, and a £1 billion investment to ensure that “every home is a warm home”.

John Swinney, the Deputy First Minister and SNP campaign director, savaged the plans.

He said: “Ruth Davidson admits her manifesto isn’t a programme for government and that her party have no intention of setting out a detailed plan on how they would run Scotland.

“That is irresponsible and disrespectful to voters, who deserve better from the Tories than a long list of things they are against and virtually nothing about what they are for or what they would do given the chance.

“Ruth Davidson’s party have no serious policies, no vision for Scotland and there has been no change in the Tory brand, which remains as toxic as ever in Scotland and which voters will utterly reject in three weeks’ time.”

Scottish Labour equalities spokesman Neil Findlay added: “Ruth Davidson wants to take Scotland back to the arguments of the past because she has nothing to say about using the powers to stop the cuts.

“It was only a few weeks ago that the Tories claimed to be in a ‘taxpayers’ alliance’ with the SNP – neither of them want to use the new powers to ask the wealthier to pay more to invest in public services. That simply isn’t good enough.”

Scottish Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie claimed the biggest financial investment the Scottish Tories want to make is in tax cuts for the highest earners to be “carbon copies” of Chancellor George Osborne.

He added: “Scotland deserves better. The Conservative tax cuts for the rich and stealth tax increases for everyone else are unfair to people in Scotland.”

Scottish Greens co-convener Patrick Harvie said: “The Tories’ unconditional support for fracking and a fossil fuel economy, and their record of forcing more households into fuel poverty, deserves the contempt of the electorate.”