Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Rise in age for free bus travel ruled out

Rise in age for free bus travel ruled out

Raising the age of free bus travel eligibility to 65 has been ruled out by the Scottish Government despite the flagship programme’s soaring cost.

A report by public spending watchdog Audit Scotland on the scheme, which gives free bus travel to the one million Scots over 60 and those with disabilities, says action must be taken to ensure the programme’s sustainability.

It also warns some routes and services could be cut because the reimbursement rates paid to bus companies for the service do not cover costs.

Before the scheme was launched in 2006, it was up to individual councils to provide free bus travel.

That service has since been provided by central government, which reimburses firms for each passenger.

However, the cost of the scheme is rising and now costs £199 million per year at 2010 prices £25 million more than at its launch.

Higher fares are blamed for the rising price, despite the Scottish Government introducing a cap on the amount of money it would pay bus companies each year.

The report also estimates the future bill could rise to £216 million by 2025, or more than £500 million if uncapped.

To offset the rising bill, the report recommends raising the age of eligibility for free bus travel to 65, which would save about £40 million a year, or introduce a flat rate of 20p a journey, which would raise around £30 million a year.Systems “not in place”Of over-60s in Scotland, 80% hold a bus pass, but the report also states the impact of the concessionary travel programme is still unclear because of a four-and-a-half-year delay in installing the technology to support it.

The cost of this has more than quadrupled over the last four years, from an original £9 million to £42 million.

Scotland’s auditor general Robert Black said, “National concessionary travel (NCT) is popular, with take-up by older people at a very high level, but there were weaknesses in how the scheme was planned and implemented.

“Systems to effectively administer NCT were not in place, and this left it more open to error and fraud.

“It is expected to take four and a half years longer than planned to fully introduce the technology that is key to the scheme working effectively, and this has cost more than four times the original budget.”

Scottish Labour transport spokesman Charlie Gordon called for Scotland’s bus services to be regulated.

He said, “It is unacceptable that those who are currently on the lower rate of disability allowance are excluded from the free bus travel scheme, but Labour’s efforts to reverse this have been rejected by the SNP and Tories.

“John Swinney must act on the warnings from passenger groups who believe that some routes could be under threat by the… reimbursement rate which he negotiated.

“Regulation would not only tackle the over-provision of buses on profitable routes, but it would make services better in rural areas and that means those eligible for the free bus scheme could make better use of it.”

A spokeswoman for Transport Scotland said the Scottish Government welcomed the report, but ruled out changing eligibility.

She said, “We welcome the Audit Scotland report which is one of a number of recent reviews and analysis of this ground-breaking national scheme.

“There are clearly lessons to be learned from how the scheme was initially established under the previous administration and we have taken this on board.”