Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

July 26: Buses better than costly rail link

July 26: Buses better than costly rail link

Today’s letters to The Courier.

Sir, – The article in Monday’s Courier entitled Boost for Rail Link Campaign states a public consultation on the recent feasibility study commissioned by the St Andrews Rail Link campaign organisers is now under way.

Based on Scottish Transport Appraisal Guidance (STAG), it is important for individuals and organisations to note that an appraisal of all transport options, not just rail, must be carried out as part of any consultancy.

With this in mind, I was pleased to recall the Courier article entitled Stagecoach Unveils its New Green Machines (July 4) reporting that a fleet of eco-friendly hybrid-electric buses was being unveiled by Stagecoach, backed by the Scottish Government Green Bus Fund.

Being eco-friendly, buses of this type would be ideal transportation for the out-of-town and Bridgehead area Madras pupils, as well as maintaining the existing highly efficient bus services connecting St Andrews, Leuchars Station, the Bridgehead areas and Dundee.

Being more economical, ecological and user-friendly, these buses must surely represent the preferred option to address the transport requirements of St Andrews and the locality, as opposed to a costly and impractical rail link into St Andrews.

For rail users, some improvement to the platform access and car parking facilities at Leuchars Station would be desirable and this is entirely feasible with the land availabile at that location.

Allan Chalmers,Links Crescent,St Andrews.

Put Pitlochry first

Sir, – In yesterday’s Courier there was an artist’s impression of the proposed development for the centre of Pitlochry, which will, in its present form, destroy the character of this lovely town and its economic viability as a popular tourist destination.

The majority of the town has been fighting Uplands Developments for nearly four years to stop it from imposing its unimaginative and insensitive designs on the town.

We now appeal to the Perth and Kinross planners, who will make the decision, to take account of local opinion and turn down this application. Pitlochry deserves better than these third-rate plans.

Everyone agrees that some sort of development is needed on this site but it should enhance the centre of Pitlochry and not destroy its character.

Perth and Kinross Council will be going directly against its own extensive policy document for conservation areas if it gives these plans the go-ahead.

Planners, you have a heavy responsibility towards present and future inhabitants of Pitlochry and to its visitors. Do not let us down.

Kate and Roger West,Croftinloan,Pitlochry.

A costly way of saving money

Sir, – The application forms are now out for the appointment of a chief constable for the new Police Service of Scotland on a salary of £208,100 a year, while a new quango will also be formed with members being paid £36,000 a year for working only 10 days a month. So much for the suggestion that the National Police force will save money.

It is interesting to note that the application forms for the top job show that candidates will be asked to show whether they consider themselves ”Scottish” or ”British”.

I hope they submit the right answer, unlike a friend of mine several decades ago who applied for a position in Lanarkshire and the first question was: ”What did you think of the team on Saturday?” He replied that had no interest in the sport, at which point the interview was terminated.

John McDonald,Rosebery Court,Kirkcaldy.

Guns don’t kill people

Sir, – In reply to Mr McDonald’s letter on Tuesday, and having lived in the USA for 30-odd years, I must say he is way off base.

What does he expect the US Government to do? Today, we are left with a legacy of gun ownership that sees 300 million guns legally registered. If the government banned guns today and offered an amnesty to gun owners, who would not show up? The bad guys.

It is a shame that no-one in that cinema was carrying a gun. Perhaps it could have stopped the atrocity.

Mr McDonald wants the government to do something. The government does not control crazies.

Does he not remember Dunblane or Norway? Both Scotland and Norway have strict gun controls.

Guns don’t kill people, people do.

Eric Swinney,Creekwood Drive,Lafayette, Louisiana,USA.

Yet more tall turbines tales

Sir, – Once again (Letters, Tuesday) we have a representative of the renewables industry, Jenny Hogan of Scottish Renewables, perpetuating a number of standard myths associated with wind turbines.

For a start, wind turbines do not ”increase our energy security”, but do the opposite. Neither do they have any meaningful role in ”reducing our carbon emissions”, as recent studies have shown. And the claim they are ”supporting thousands of Scottish jobs” is a nonsense every large-scale turbine, and many of their structural components, are manufactured abroad.

Supporting thousands of jobs, yes, but not for Scots.

GM Lindsay,Whinfield Gardens,Kinross.

Get involved: to have your say on these or any other topics, email your letter to letters@thecourier.co.uk or send to Letters Editor, The Courier, 80 Kingsway East, Dundee DD4 8SL. Letters should be accompanied by an address and a daytime telephone number.