Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Gender balance at Scottish Parliament might correct itself once claws come out

Gender balance at Scottish Parliament might correct itself once claws come out

The campaign to get more women involved in politics has been renewed of late, with MSPs from the Labour, SNP, Lib Dem and Green parties demanding some kind of quota system, to redress the gender imbalance in the Holyrood parliament.

Why now? It seems a strange time for Scotland’s female politicians to get exercised about the issue. Last week, nominations for the SNP leadership closed, leaving Nicola Sturgeon unchallenged. The upshot is that in under a month, when Alex Salmond steps down, Scotland will have its first female First Minister.

Scottish Labour is headed by Johann Lamont, the Conservatives’ Scottish leader is Ruth Davidson and even the Presiding Officer is a woman Tricia Marwick. This, by most parliaments’ standards, is pretty impressive on the equality front.

In stark contrast, David Cameron has struggled to find enough women to put in his Cabinet, Labour has never had a female leader nationally and the Lib Dems’ one truly powerful woman (Miriam Clegg) is not a politician.

But look at Scotland; its legislature is awash with women. By this time next month, Willie Rennie, the Scottish Lib Dem leader, will be a lonely man in a chamber dominated by its distaff side.

Scotland has long bucked the UK trend, with its Nordic-like levels of representation. In the first devolved parliament of 199, nearly 40% of members were women. This has now gone down to 35%, but that still puts Scotland in the forefront of female-friendly parliaments, ranking 22nd in the world, compared to the Commons, which is 57th and has just 20% of female MPs.

Labour and the SNP used quotas, formally and informally, in the first Scottish elections and today’s younger politicians, such as Labour’s Kezia Dugdale, are trying to engineer a 50-50 ratio; they believe more women would lead to better policies and build a better Scotland.

The idea that women’s feminising influence would make the parliament more benign, less confrontational and more consensual was one of the ideals of devolution. It was to be the dawn of the new politics.

Things didn’t quite turn out that way, as anyone who has witnessed First Minister’s Questions would testify. We have seen the likes of Wendy Alexander and Annabel Goldie leading their parties but Scottish politics did not become less adversarial.

And we don’t have to wait until Ms Sturgeon is in post to discover what a female-led parliament will really look or sound like.

One of the highlights (if you like that sort of thing) of the referendum was the scrap between Ms Sturgeon and Ms Lamont during a finger-jabbing STV debate. “Catfight” and “fishwives” among the kinder descriptions did not come close.

With a general election looming, it will be brutal business as usual. Ms Lamont’s leadership was seriously undermined in the referendum by the loss of the Labour heartlands to the SNP. Although Gordon Brown and Jim Murphy have resisted calls from (male) Labour MPs to replace her, she remains under a cloud as she tries to seize back the Labour vote from the nationalists.

Ms Sturgeon not only has to prove she is a match for her pugilistic predecessor; she also has to appease the influx of agitators in her party who want a re-run of September 18. Watching her every move from the back benches will be Mr Salmond, a permanently disgruntled figure for disaffected separatists to cling to if she fails to deliver on devo max.

Ms Davidson, meanwhile, having raised her profile by the end of the referendum, will be desperate to capitalise on No voters’ support. She wants to expand her party’s appeal to the centre right, as both Labour and the SNP lurch leftwards.

For all the women leaders, this is not the moment for compromise or cooperation; there will be no room for niceties when the sisterhood takes over.

In fact, it is the men who may come to feel marginalised by the regular spectacle of female ferociousness. It is they who may well be discouraged, by the nastiness, from furthering their political careers, or entering the game in the first place.

Perhaps the gender balance might correct itself without the need for quotas, once the claws come out.