Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

East Fife takeover moves a step closer

New Bayview Park.
New Bayview Park.

East Fife were on the verge of new ownership after a bid by four existing board members to take control was agreed in principle.

Directors Jim Stevenson, Dave Marshall, John Barclay and John Donaldson’s offer for the majority shareholding – which is thought to be in the region of £380,000 – has been approved by the current owners and heads of terms have been agreed, meaning that the start of another new chapter at the Methil club is closer than ever.

The directors’ bid has gone ahead in spite of pleas from the East Fife Supporters Society (EFSS) to shelve their plans and work with them to bring about a fan ownership model, with the fans’ group recently expressing concerns about the board’s blueprint to take the club forward.

Nevertheless, the directors have ploughed on regardless with talks with representatives of majority shareholders Lorraine Johnston and Samantha Twigg behind the scenes and these reached a breakthrough yesterday after Ms Johnston said the deal is “acceptable subject to contract”.

The matter is now in the hands of solicitors, but chairman Mr Stevenson who stepped into the role following the departure of Lee Murray earlier this year is convinced that the directors’ plan is the best way forward for the Fifers.

“We’ve come to an agreement with the majority shareholders and they’ve accepted our proposal,” he told Courier Sport.

“We’re going to go forward with trying to purchase the club and there will be an open meeting at Bayview for all fans at 7pm on Monday to hear about what’s happening.

“The proposal is with the owners’ lawyers now and we just want to get on with the job and bring some stability to the club.”

As per the directors’ bid, a separate holding company would be set up which would see the directors retain control of 52% of the club’s shares for at least five years.

When that period is up, it has been suggested that the directors would offer their shareholding to the EFSS at the original purchase price, with the EFSS and others being invited to purchase the remaining shares if they desired.

On that point yesterday, Mr Stevenson added: “We’ve already stated we’d like to establish a different kind of set-up further down the line, but we need to get this stability now.

“We’re happy to talk to the EFSS, and under the four directors’ proposal we will get some stability so it will be up to us here in Methil to negotiate with the EFSS in future.”

The EFSS said they would have preferred a joint bid with the directors after casting doubt on the near-£800,000 valuation given to Mr Stevenson and his colleagues at the beginning of the process.

The EFSS told Courier Sport recently that their own due diligence process suggested the £800,000 figure was too high considering the value of the land at New Bayview, reportedly worth around £150,000, and the current financial state of the club.

They also cast doubt over how the club is currently being managed financially, suggesting that a “pattern of considerable losses” were only averted “literally by the luck of a good cup draw” citing ties against Aberdeen and Rangers in recent seasons and the income from big league attendances at home to Rangers last term.

Last night, a spokesperson for the EFSS said they had noted the agreement in principle with interest and are understandably keen to find out the finer details.

“While we clearly do not know the terms of purchase, we had been advised that the valuation of £380,000 that has been mentioned seemed much greater than the club was worth,” the EFSS concluded.

“For that reason we were awaiting the result of our due diligence process before putting in a bid.

“We had asked the directors for a meeting a week ago to discuss matters further but had received no response.

“We will continue to be willing to support and be involved with the club and wish the directors well in their purchase.”