Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fears controversial Angus pipeline will damage Scottish agriculture

Fears controversial Angus pipeline will damage Scottish agriculture

A controversial pipeline spanning 11 miles of the Angus coast will have a wider impact on Scottish agriculture, according to a national body.

And local councillors face a tough decision on Tuesday when faced with plans for the huge electrical cable between Carnoustie and Tealing.

Should members of the development standards committee agree with a top council officer, land will be torn up across miles of farmland to make way for electrical cables connected with a massive offshore windfarm.

Plans to “onshore” power generated by two wind fields in the North Sea have generated 27 objections so far, and the National Farmers’ Union Scotland has described environmental impact surveys behind the plans as inadequate.

Legal and technical policy manager Gemma Thomson states in an objection: “Agriculture is one of the most important industries in Scotland, and one which is of vital importance in an economic context.

“This is particularly important in Angus, where the exceptional quality of the farmland plays a pivotal role.”

“It is without doubt that the 23 farmers affected by this development will be directly affected by this proposal (and) will suffer a detrimental effect.”

As part of a larger 3.5GW SSE and Fluor joint venture named Seagreen, the project could supply 670,000 houses with wind-generated energy but it needs a point onshore to deal with the energy.

The Courier first revealed the project and large-scale concerns for the pipeline in April last year.

A report by Angus Council’s strategic director for communities Alan McKeown recommends approval for the project, with conditions but councillors have the final say.

The windfarm element of Seagreen will comprise 150 wind turbines of more than 600 feet, with a 1GW capacity. Only the output from farms Alpha and Bravo will be brought ashore in Angus, but even then it will involve large-scale civil works.

A statement from the firm forecast “significant impacts” on the land around the construction phase that will be fully reversed after the pipeline is finished.

The cabling would run between the mean low water mark at Carnoustie beach and a substation in Tealing.

Alpha and Bravo are 17 and 23 miles from Arbroath and installation of the cables could start next year with the first turbines going up in 2017 and the whole project finishing in 2019. The cabling will cross the A930, A92 and A90 and its operational lifespan would be 25 years.

Ms Thomson warns of a “wider knock-on effect” in Scotland, as much of the UK’s quality seed potato production is based in Angus.

She states: “The potential serious nature of a wider knock on effect on agriculture in Scotland should not be underestimated.

“It is extremely worrying that the applicant does not appear to have grasped the importance of biosecurity NFU Scotland considers it would be prudent for an entirely new environmental impact assessment to be commissioned.

“It is imperative that this is completed via an impartial source only then can the interests of agriculture be considered adequately safeguarded.”

An objection was also lodged by Charles Simmers, owner of Tealing airfield. His agents wrote that the site of the substation would be intended for his land, which has already been promised in a “binding contract” to another developer.

Stewart Duff from Kingennie raised an objection that is largely representative of those who feel their homes will be adversely affected.

He wrote to the council about his concerns for drainage, stating: “The works may have an impact to the fields draining through the arable land to the south of our houses. The area is frequently flooded.”