Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Safety fears over disused Dunfermline flood defence works site

Fife Council maintains the site is safe.
Fife Council maintains the site is safe.

A whistleblower has voiced his fears someone could be injured or worse as Dunfermline’s beleaguered flood prevention scheme continues to drag on.

This year Fife Council splashed more cash on the much-maligned project, which is already a massive £11 million over budget and four years late in being completed.

It also terminated its contract with Byzak Ltd and announced it was to start court action against project designers Atkins Ltd.

But a council insider, who did not wish to be named, said the scheme was Dunfermline’s answer to Edinburgh’s trams. The latest delay is “extending the misery” for hundreds of residents who have had to endure years of upset.

But his main concern is a safety one.

“When the works were halted Fife Council was very vocal about assuring the public that they would keep the work areas in safe and secure condition until another contractor was found. Since then they have failed to do even the basics.

“The Forth Street work site has two areas within the open and running burn, which now look like partially-built swimming pools.

“It would be easy for children to access this area unnoticed; if they were to fall or swim in these areas, it is highly likely they could be injured or worse by submerged objects.”

He also cited financial implications concerning the unsecured sites and claimed thieves appeared to be removing large amounts of building materials. He also accused the council of discussing the issue in private.

“This is a small flood prevention scheme, not Watergate,” he added.

Derek Crowe, roads and engineering services senior manager, said that after the council had terminated the contract with Byzak, it was unavoidable that nothing could happen until a new contractor was appointed.

He said the council had employed a private security firm that visits the site six times a day.

“The remaining areas of the site and the area where the building materials are stored are fenced off with the same type of site fencing previously used by Byzak.

The fencing continues to be vandalised but we repair it as soon as it’s reported. The work at Forth Street is not finished but is safe.”

Mr Crowe added the council was well on the way to finding a new contractor. Tenders will be returned on May 2 and the successful candidate should be appointed by May 23, with work expected to start on June 16 and be completed by the end of October, two months earlier than Byzak’s proposed timescale.

“As we’re seeking legal advice in relation to this project, we’re not required to publish reports going to committee,” he added.