Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

‘Under siege’ Ochils residents learn of new windfarm plan

‘Under siege’ Ochils residents learn of new windfarm plan

The prospect of yet another giant windfarm development in the Ochils has stunned besieged residents.

Developers seeking to profit from the renewable energy boom have repeatedly targeted the area for development.

Application after application has been brought to Perth and Kinross and Clackmannanshire councils.

The hills are already home to a number of sizeable developments as the “industrialisation” of the country’s wild places continues.

They include the 18-turbine Green Knowes, 12-turbine Lochelbank and the expanding Burnfoot Hill site, which straddles the border between the two local authority areas.

A slew of other developments have been thrown out by Scottish Government reporters following appeals, while a number of smaller developments have been given permission.

Now, news of proposals for a further 25 turbines has been broken to communities in and around the Ochil Hills and to surprised local councillors.

The Heads Hill Community Wind Farm Proposal is only in the very earliest stages of development and Cornwall-based developer Community Windpower Limited has stressed that details may change following public consultation.

A site has been identified some five miles northwest of Kinross and 20-25 turbines have been proposed, each rising 150 metres into the sky, from ground to blade tip.

Community Windpower said the proposals would be subject to extensive studies, surveys and consultations before being taken forward, but believes the site could provide enough energy to power more than 60,000 homes.

The plans were an unwelcome surprise when broken to members of Fossoway Community Council.

Secretary Kevin Borthwick said: “Residents do very much feel as though they are under siege from windfarm developers.

“We initially understood that there was supposed to be a limit to the amount of turbines that could be built in the Ochils, but this has long been surpassed and yet more developers want to move in.

“It seems never-ending and it feels as if the area is being flooded with these schemes.”

Community council colleague and chairman Alexander Morrison said: “We have written to Perth and Kinross Council to tell them that we really need to have proper guidelines in order to govern their proliferation.

“Our view, and that of the community, is that this latest large windfarm is against policy for the Ochils as there are already several large windfarms present and others proposed just over the border in Fife, such as Outh Muir and Blairadam.

“Areas of great landscape value are disappearing and, while we are not against windfarms per se, they need to be coordinated properly so that they do not sprout up everywhere.

“We are seeing more and more turbines and they are getting taller and taller and I am in no doubt that our beautiful countryside will be spoilt by too many.”

The Heads Hill proposals will be raised at further meetings of the community council and in consultation with neighbouring community councils.

Campaigners, including the Friends of the Ochils, have been fighting for the hills to be designated an Area of Great Landscape Value for some time in order to afford them greater protection.

New research undertaken by conservation charity the National Trust for Scotland, however, reveals that almost three-quarters of people feel they have no say over changes to their local landscape.

Its report, entitled The Land We Love”, contained findings gathered through surveys of 700 National Trust for Scotland members, around 1,000 members of the Scottish public, and those who attended a major national conference.

Head of policy, Diarmid Hearns, said: “Our research confirms that people in Scotland value the landscape and want to see it protected. The impact of adverse developments on our lochs and mountains, coastal landscapes and historic settings is a worry, especially locally.”