Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Petition step ‘disappoints’ councillor

Mr Vettraino outside Bankhead House.
Mr Vettraino outside Bankhead House.

A Glenrothes councillor says he is “disappointed” more local members were not given the chance to hear public concerns over a controversial housing plan.

Ross Vettraino, representative for Glenrothes Central and Thornton, added that he was “surprised” that only 10 letters of objection had been received by the local authority over plans to build 11 affordable properties at Tantallon Avenue in Pitteuchar.

The proposals were approved by planning committee members last week, despite widespread concern from residents and a petition containing more than 200 signatures.

Given the extent of people’s concerns, however, Mr Vettraino said he expected more formal objections to have been made. “My advice at the time was for those who hadn’t already provided feedback to the council to do so without delay,” he said.

“In particular, I stressed that I thought it was important that any objections were made before the proposal reached the planning stage because there has to be a sound reason in planning terms before a proposal can be refused.

“The council may not always be able to do what people want but it has a duty to explain its actions.

“It may be that all the 210 signatories to the petition in objection to the development thought that there was no need for individual objections to be made.

“I think that it would have been best if the petition had been submitted to the Glenrothes area committee and I was disappointed to learn that it had been decided not to do so.”

Residents’ concerns had focused on the lack of parking for new properties and the loss of land used as a play space by children.

The seven houses and four flats will see the demolition of the former Bankhead House children’s home.

Since the election of the Labour-led administration in 2012, planning decisions have been taken by three committees in Fife, featuring councillors from across the area.

Previously, such decisions were determined by local councillors at area committee level, allowing all local councillors to consider residents’ concerns.

David Robertson, Fife Council’s affordable housing and regeneration team manager, said that the local authority had utilised feedback from Tantallon Avenue residents before it entered the formal planning process.

“We found the feedback from the community on the pre-planning activity useful, as it highlighted that there was a concern about parking,” he said.

“We were able to address this in our revised proposal, which was then submitted as part of the planning application.”