Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Incontinence operation ‘relatively safe’

Incontinence operation ‘relatively safe’

A large-scale review of controversial surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI), a common condition which affects around 170,000 women in the UK, shows it has been found to be “relatively safe” health experts have said.

Some of those who have received the procedure suffered painful and debilitating complications, with reports of women suffering internal lacerations that have made their quality of life worse than it was before.

The problems led Health Secretary Shona Robison to ask health boards to suspend the operation until an independent inquiry has been published, while court action is being taken in the UK, the United States and Canada.

A Cochrane review found that the procedure, which involves inserting a mesh sling to support the muscles of the bladder by either the groin or abdomen, results in similar cure rates of 70%-80%.

The groin procedure, known as transobturator insertion, carried a lower risk of bladder damage during the operation with around six women in 1,000 experiencing this compared with 50 in 1,000 who had the abdomen procedure, known as the retropubic route.

But the analysis of 81 trials found that the transobturator operation led to more short-term groin pain and there was some evidence that women who had it were more likely to need a repeat operation later.

Professor Cathryn Glazener of the University of Aberdeen, who has carried out previous research on the surgery and is part of the independent review, said: “Overall the operations have been found to be relatively safe and relatively effective.”

She added this would “suggest these operations would or should be available to women given choice and adequate information about it”.

Lead author Dr Abigail Ford, from Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, said: “This is a very significant review informing women about the minimally invasive surgical options available for the treatment of this very debilitating condition.

“It helps to clarify the pre-existing evidence on the effectiveness of these approaches and their side-effects in the short term, as well as introducing longer term evidence of efficacy and safety.

“It helps to give women more information to make an informed choice.”

The independent review is due to be published in the autumn, with today’s findings forming part of it.