Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

New study suggests benefits from GM crops

New study suggests benefits from GM crops

Failure to give British farmers access to genetically modified (GM) crops could damage the future competitiveness of UK agriculture, claims a new report.

The independent study, commissioned by cereals levy body HGCA, has found that adoption of GM cereals and oilseeds crops in the UK could benefit farmers, consumers and the animal feed supply chain.

The 96-page report, published by researchers at Reading University, pulls together data from more than 170 publications, reports and studies into the use of the technology in the UK. It focuses on the science behind the technology, rather than consumer acceptability of GM products.

“We felt it was important to develop an independent evidence base, free from distortion and speculation, to better prepare the industry for the implications of GM crop production should the technology become available in the UK,” said Dr Vicky Foster from HGCA.

According to the study, growing insecticide resistant (IR) maize and herbicide tolerant (HT) oilseed rape only delivered a positive impact on gross margins when farmers were under “continued pest and weed pressure situations”.

In severe pest and weed situations, gross margins could increase by up to 15.2% for continuous IR maize, 16.6% for continuous HT oilseed rape, and 10.2% for HT rape in a four-crop rotation.

The growth of these GM crops would also produce a cleaner crop, improve soil condition and reduce weed burden returned to the land, said the study.

Environmental impact of GM crops was studied in relation to evidence from countries already using the technology.

Researchers said HT and IR traits in crops reduced the amount of active ingredients applied in crop production, but with HT crops there was a risk of herbicide-resistant weeds developing.

They also reduced the frequency of farm machinery usage, thus lowering soil erosion and increasing soil moisture retention, as well as reducing fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions.

However, Dr Foster said ultimately the viability of growing GM crops would depend on consumer demand.

She said: “We live in a market economy, and farmers and processors are reliant on consumer demand for their products.

“Although this study demonstrates there would be tangible benefits to farmers and the environment in certain GM crop production scenarios, ultimately the decision rests in the hands of the consumer.”

This is a view shared by the Scottish Government, which has repeatedly said it is not in favour of GM crops being grown in Scotland, due to a lack of customer demand.

Responding to the study, a Government spokeswoman said: “We will consider the findings of this report, but note that it recognises we live in a market economy and that there has to be a demand for the products our farmers produce.

“There is no evidence of significant demand for GM products by Scottish consumers, and to grow GM crops in Scotland would damage our clean and green brand.”