Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

JENNY HJUL: Life of privilege has made Prince Harry spoilt – and now he has really lost it

Harry and Meghan.
Harry and Meghan.

Of all the frontline royals, Prince Harry seemed to have navigated the family’s often perilous relationship with the press most successfully.

Despite youthful pranks and lapses of judgment, his natural charm and playfulness tended to win over the cynics.

Unlike his big brother William, whose tetchiness is never far from the surface, Harry looked able to ride with the punches of a life lived in the public eye and to almost enjoy the attention.

So what went wrong? From those larky scenes a few years ago – trying to race Usain Bolt, wowing the crowds with a heart-warming speech on his father’s 70th birthday, and capturing the nation’s hearts on his wedding day – to now?

Harry has just launched a war on the media, suing the publishers of The Sun and The Daily Mirror for alleged phone hacking.

In a separate case, his wife Meghan is fighting a legal battle with The Mail on Sunday over its publication of a letter she wrote to her estranged father.

Not content to leave these matters with the lawyers, Harry also lashed out at the tabloids for the “relentless propaganda” against his wife, in language described as unprecedentedly vitriolic by royal watchers.

Before the lawsuits even reach the courts, the Sussexes are dividing public opinion, and the risk for them is that they will lose the huge amounts of goodwill that were effortlessly theirs from the moment they stepped out as a couple.

There will be some sympathy for Harry because of his mother’s tragic death. He and William have always been on the defensive over any press intrusion, and Harry cited Diana in his tirade last week.

But as Princess Diana’s private secretary, Patrick Jephson, said over the weekend, in an article for The Observer, she did not use “invective more normally found in the White House to communicate with a free and fundamentally friendly press”.

It is telling that such a comment should come from a royal aide who spent eight years alongside a member of the family who was subjected to far more scrutiny than Harry or Meghan have been, but who at some level understood the unwritten pact with the newspapers.

As Jephson put it, this involves a “historic deal that’s overseen by the British media holding to account public figures whose lives are subsidised by the (usually) benign British taxpayers”.

Harry had appeared to grasp this; he and Meghan have been setting their own agenda as young royals, embracing projects that suit them rather than the establishment, and thereby furthering causes close to their hearts.

Harry’s Invictus Games for injured ex-servicemen and women is a fabulous example of how this can work in practice. If he had been a commoner, it is unlikely the prince would have had either the good fortune or the immense funds, or indeed the organisational genius, to stage such a worthy spectacle.

Meghan, meanwhile, had hit the ground running as a new royal, easily winning public support for her championing of the downtrodden.

As a pair they were regarded as a breath of fresh air, but the fact that their honeymoon is over so quickly is largely their own fault.

While espousing environmental charities, Harry and Meghan managed to hop on and off private jets four times in 11 days. And while they championed the poor, they squandered money, including £2.4 million on their grace and favour pad on the royal estate at Windsor. Harry isn’t the first royal to be guilty of double standards but he may be less constrained by protocol than his forebears, his father included.

There was much talk about the Sussexes having their own court but that scheme was given short shrift – mercifully. More control, not less, by the palace is called for.

A life of privilege has inevitably made Harry spoilt. According to those who have observed him at close quarters – such as the journalist Angela Levin who followed him for more than a year, he is on a short fuse. This was evident just last week when he snapped at Sky’s royal correspondent Rhiannon Mills for daring to ask him a question.

Now he has really lost it and, by the timing of his outburst and his and Meghan’s legal actions, undone all the positive press of their recent South African tour. The Sussexes have yet to learn that living in the lap of luxury and being able to indulge every whim comes at a price.