Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Scottish voters were flooded with election junk mail as spending soared by 64%

Unsolicited mail increased significantly in the Holyrood election.
Unsolicited mail increased significantly in the Holyrood election.

The coronavirus pandemic triggered a huge rise in spending on junk mail by political parties in the run-up to the last Holyrood election, new figures show.

Official data revealed the bill for unsolicited campaign leaflets reached almost £2.8 million ahead of the Scottish Parliament vote in May last year.

Parties flooded the letterboxes of Scottish voters, increasing spending on the tactic by 64% when compared to the near £1.7m bill racked up during the 2016 campaign.

The rise of more than £1m was the most significant factor in overall campaigning costs jumping from £3.3m in 2016, to just more than £5m last year.

With parties unable to conduct traditional door-to-door canvassing due to social distancing rules, the data from the Electoral Commission suggests they focused much of their efforts on direct mail, rather than social media, as many had been expecting.

Alistair Clark, a reader in politics at Newcastle University, analysed the figures. 

He said: “I think the expectation in advance of the 2021 Scottish Parliament elections was that the likes of social media, more media work, and that kind of stuff, would take up the slack, because of distancing requirements and party activists not able to go door-knocking and that kind of thing.

“What the election spending data shows is that that has not really been the case. It’s more tried and tested methods of campaigning.”

Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar on the campaign trail putting election leaflets through doors in Glasgow.

Mr Clark said research showed door-to-door campaigning is the best way to win over voters, followed by direct mail, despite much of it “ending up in the bin”.

The elections expert said: “There is academic research that shows that does actually work, and I think these figures do back that academic research up.

“Most of the £1.7m increase in spending was actually on these methods. Very, very clearly, those tried and tested methods were what parties fell in behind at these elections.”

Dr Alistair Clark, reader in politics at Newcastle University.

The SNP spent the most on the election campaign, at £1.46m, which was almost the same amount as in 2016.

However, the unionist parties dramatically increased their investment, with the Conservatives’ bill rising from almost £979,000 in 2016 to £1.36m last year, Labour’s going from £337,000 to £1.17m, and the Lib Dems from £186,000 to £434,000.

SNP was ‘slower to get off the mark’

Mr Clark also believed the pro-UK parties focused on direct mail at an earlier stage.

“What struck me this last election was just how early they started appearing, and particularly my sense was from the unionist parties.

“The SNP, I think, were a wee bit slower to get off the mark with things going out, at least in my experience.

Scottish Conservative Leader Douglas Ross takes to the streets to leaflet in Edinburgh.

“But really from about early January onwards they were coming through.

“And not just one or two pieces, this will be several pieces and increasing in volume towards election day.”

Louise Edwards, director of regulation at the Electoral Commission, said: ”The Commission has now published all reported spending information from parties, campaigners and candidates relating to last year’s Scottish Parliament election.

“Delivering this transparency ensures voters are able to see clearly and accurately how money is spent on influencing them at this election.”