Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Fife Council wants overhaul of planning system

Cllr Lesley Laird and John McKenzie from Inverkeithing Community Council at the Spencerfield site.
Cllr Lesley Laird and John McKenzie from Inverkeithing Community Council at the Spencerfield site.

Fife Council is calling for change to the Scottish planning system to empower communities, as well as manage developers’ aspirations.

It comes on the back of a controversial development earmarked for Spencerfield in west Fife.

A Scottish Government reporter granted an application for 295 houses on the greenfield site near Inverkeithing despite it being resisted by both the council and community.

Depute leader Lesley Laird has now written to communities minister Alex Neil and chief planner John McNairney to voice her concerns about decisions made before Fife’s proposed local development plan is finalised.

“A modern planning system must empower local communities to shape the development of the places they live in,” she said.

She argued that the controversial Spencerfield appeal had been allowed while the proposed Fife Local Development Plan (LDP) was still being examined.

“Fife Council’s position in the proposed LDP is that this site should not be allocated for housing, and the actions taken appear to be wholly inconsistent with the Scottish Government’s purported approach.”

She said it was confused even further with reporters dealing with the local development plan examination asking some local people for their comments about the site, despite the fact that another reporter has recently already granted planning permission on appeal.

“This raises hope and expectations that there is still an opportunity to overturn the appeal decision, when this is not the case,” she said.

“These inconsistencies send out the wrong signals to our communities, and I am concerned that the individuals and communities who have contributed to LDP will question the value of their participation in the process.

“This case gets to the heart of why the planning system in Scotland needs an overhaul.

“Despite the development being resisted by the local community, community groups and local members this development is set to go ahead.

“To truly deliver what local people want, there’s a clear need to further devolve planning powers to local authorities.”