Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Almost 40% have bin collection bans lifted

Farmer John Picken is pleased his door-to-door collection will continue.
Farmer John Picken is pleased his door-to-door collection will continue.

Many country folk outraged at having to drag their bins to road ends to save refuse collectors from travelling up bumpy tracks have won their battle against Fife Council.

Hundreds of residents appealed against the local authority’s decision to stop bin lorries driving up their farm roads and 38% were successful.

There was a furore when rural residents were told of the new arrangements to protect employees from exposure to whole-body vibrations, said to cause back injury.

A review was conducted of rural access roads and those that were considered to be in poor condition, too narrow or lacking turning space were scrapped from the lorries’ rounds.

The new collection points are being adopted as a recycling service is introduced, which will allow householders to have cans, plastics, paper and cardboard uplifted.

As well as concerns about the inconvenience of transporting bins back and forth, particularly for elderly or disabled people, there are worries about thousands of large wheeled bins being left at the side of busy roads.

Of the 460 households which appealed, 176 have been told by the council’s transportation and environment service that their door-to-door collection will continue.

Opposition councillor Donald Macgregor said: “When nearly four out of every 10 appeals against change are upheld, it begs the question how the service got it so wrong?

“Surely it would have been better to have taken more care with the initial assessment of the suitability of roads, choice of vehicle etc and come up with a more appropriate scheme, which would have saved everybody’s time, energy and worry.”

Fellow Liberal Democrat councillor Elizabeth Riches said: “We welcome the fact that many rural Fifers will now have a chance to recycle household waste more easily and that there will be vehicles coming all the way up to their houses and farms to empty the bins.

“For some of those who have not had their appeal upheld, arrangements have been made for a vehicle to visit twice a month to empty landfill bins.

“As far as recycling is concerned, for these people recycling will still be possible when they visit supermarkets etc that offer these facilities.”

Farmer John Picken, of Priorletham Farm, near St Andrews, was furious at being told his access road was too narrow for bin lorries, despite being able to drive his combine harvester up it.

However, he has reached an agreement that one lorry, rather than two, will continue to serve his home and the 13 others nearby.

He said: “I am very pleased Fife Council has been able to come up with a sensible solution for this part of the neighbourhood but there are others who haven’t had such a good outcome.

“It’s a shame it has come to this. We in the country pay our council tax like everyone else but we don’t get the all the services those who live in the towns do.”

Councillor Pat Callaghan, executive spokesman for transportation and environment, said: “All 5,400 rural properties that we collect waste from received a thorough assessment and decisions were based on the information gathered and advice from independent consultants.

“This criteria was agreed by the former environment, enterprise and transportation committee.

“The consultation was expanded to include specific issues, including access.

“Of the 5,400 residences offered the new rural collection service, 460 appeals were received and 176 appeals were upheld.

“The appeals process allowed residents the opportunity to feedback if they felt the risk assessments were inaccurate and to let us know if improvements had been made since the assessments were carried out.”