Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Witness tells abduction trial he felt ‘afraid’ to call out for help

From left: Robert Selby and William Moore.
From left: Robert Selby and William Moore.

Injuries sustained by an Angus man during an alleged abduction and robbery were “highly unlikely” to have been caused by a prolonged assault, a trial has heard.

Perth men Robert Selby and William Moore appeared at Forfar Sheriff Court accused of attacking Jonathan Gourley at his Airlie home and forcing him to draw £1,500 from a Forfar bank against his will.

Selby, 34, and Moore, 33, deny detaining Mr Gourley, robbing him, and assaulting him to his severe injury, permanent disfigurement, permanent impairment and to the danger of his life.

Jurors previously heard evidence from Mr Gourley, 42, that he took “around 80 punches” to the temple from Moore before the pair drove him to the Clydesdale Bank on Castle Street on October 22.

The trial heard evidence from Mr Gourley’s friend and employee David Hamilton, 52, a joiner.

He said he was at Cantsmill Farm Cottage, near Kirriemuir, when the two accused visited and told his friend he was to go to the bank to draw out money, which he initially refused to do.

Mr Hamilton said Moore began punching Mr Gourley “well over 20 times” before he agreed to be driven to his branch.

He was asked by Selby’s defence agent Stephen Laverty why he did not call for help when he followed Selby’s works van to Forfar in his own car.

Mr Hamilton said he was “afraid for what they might do to John” if he drew attention to himself.

The court also heard evidence from Dr Maria Cresta, 27, a dentist at the maxillofacial unit at Ninewells Hospital.

Dr Cresta said Gourley, referred to the unit on October 23, was “intoxicated” but able to answer her questions. In her opinion his injuries would require a “significant blunt force” to the eye socket. His eye was fitted with a titanium mesh and two 5mm screws.

Dr Rudy Crawford, 66, a recently retired consultant from Glasgow Royal Infirmary, gave expert evidence for the defence.

He said it was “highly unlikely” that Mr Gourley’s injury would have resulted from a sustained assault, but was a “blowout fracture” normally caused by a “severe blunt force” directly to the eye socket.

“It could happen as a result of a fall or the result of a contact with a blunt object. It could be a punch,” he said.

When asked what would happen if a person experienced multiple blows to the temple, as in evidence given by Mr Gourley, Dr Crawford said this would likely cause a serious fracture and arterial damage described in the Bible passage of David against Goliath. This was not evident.

The trial, in front of a jury of eight women and seven men, continues.