Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Violent stalker’s sentence appeal success ‘compounds victim’s suffering’

Violent stalker’s sentence appeal success ‘compounds victim’s suffering’

A victim support charity has condemned appeal court judges for cutting the jail sentence of a violent stalker ruling that the love letters and phone calls he bombarded his ex-partner with weren’t particularly unpleasant.

Paul McLean was locked up for brutally assaulting his girlfriend Lynn Suttie in 2013, leaving her with a shattered jaw.

But he defied a court order banning him from contacting her and stalked her from behind bars.

In January, Perth Sheriff Court heard that he phoned her house dozens of times and wrote to her, demanding photographs.

And when he was freed early from prison, he turned up at the hairdresser’s home in Kinross.

Jailing him for 30 months, Sheriff Fiona Tait told 45-year-old McLean: “The stalking is a serious matter. In a short period after your release from prison you were in breach of the non-harassment order. For them to have meaning and offer protection they must be adhered to.”

Now lawyers for McLean have successfully managed to get his sentence reduced to just 18 months after taking his case to the Court of Criminal Appeals in Edinburgh, meaning he is likely to be released before the end of the year.

A leading victim support charity said it was “amazed” McLean’s sentenced had been reduced.

In his judgment, Lord Carloway, the Lord Justice Clerk, agreed that McLean needed to be sent to prison, but said Sheriff Tait’s sentence was “excessive”.

He said: “The court agrees with the sheriff that the only appropriate sentence for these offences was a custodial one of some considerable duration.

“Each offence must be regarded as significant when seen against the background of the previous conviction for assault to serious injury.

“Nevertheless, there is substance in this submission that each of these sentences is excessive.

“As was stressed by appellant (McLean), the contact was ostensibly of a conciliatory tone, which differentiated it from an unpleasant or aggressive harassment.”

The non-harassment order against McLean will remain in place, however.

Geri Burnikell, coordinator at Supportline, said: “We are amazed that the sentence has been reduced.

“It is totally irrelevant the nature of the contacts he mad. It was clear this was a sustained period of harassment and as such would have caused enormous distress.”

She added: “The emotional effect of stalking and harassment can be long-lasting and we would have thought that on appeal the sentence should have increased and not reduced.

“It is sad to see that some judges clearly have no real understanding of the issue, which further compounded the suffering of the victim seeing sentencing reduced in this way.”

The appeal court heard that while at Perth prison, McLean made some 60-70 calls to Miss Suttie “leaving messages of an apparently affectionate nature on her answering machine”.

He also sent seven letters, one of which asked Miss Suttie to tell the procurator fiscal that she had exaggerated her assault allegations.

Miss Suttie was “terrified” when McLean visited her home in June last year, four days after he was freed from prison.

McLean had attacked his partner of 13 years in April 2013 after a row about his amphetamine abuse. He broke her jaw in two places with a single punch.

He was told the relationship was over shortly afterwards.

Already a subscriber? Sign in