Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Tory claims SNP MP wants ‘completely mad’ system where non-claimants subsidise people on welfare to have more children

Tory claims SNP MP wants ‘completely mad’ system where non-claimants subsidise people on welfare to have more children

People on benefits should not be allowed or encouraged to have more than two children, a Conservative MP has suggested.

Pauline Latham, MP for Mid Derbyshire, told the Commons that workers who do not receive tax credits, and have the number of children they can afford, should not be subsidising other people to have more children.

She claimed Eilidh Whiteford, the SNP’s welfare spokeswoman, had used her response to the Budget to support a “completely mad” system in which people on benefits would be allowed to have three, four or five children at the expense of “responsible” people who do not receive welfare.

But Ms Whiteford disagreed with the Tory MP’s interpretation of her speech, adding she had been misrepresented.

The Government has proposed limiting tax credits to two children from April 2017.

Speaking during the Budget debate, Ms Latham said: “I found it astonishing that (Ms Whiteford) should be advocating that people on benefits should be allowed to have, and encouraged to have, more than two children whereas people who are completely responsible, and recognise that children are expensive to bring up, who can’t afford to bring them up because they’re not on benefits, are choosing to subsidise those that she would like to see have three, four, five children, which is completely mad.”

Ms Whiteford replied: “I have to say to you I think you misrepresent what I actually said and what the record will show I said.

“I think the point I was really trying to make was that half of all families in Scotland receive tax credits and a huge majority of the people receiving them are in work, people who work extremely hard.”

Ms Latham added to Ms Whiteford: “I recognise what you say, that most of the people getting tax credits are in work, but I still do not believe that people who are in work, who are not receiving tax credits, who are acting responsibly and having the number of children they can afford to keep, should be subsiding those to have more children.

“I just think that that is completely topsy-turvy economics. It may be the way some of the members opposite in Scotland deal with economics but I don’t think it’s what we want to do here in London.

“I’m very disappointed by your attitude to that and I feel you have completely misrepresented what we’re doing, this Government is doing.”