Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Sports Direct criticised by judge for ‘abuse of court processes’ during dispute with Rangers

A sign above the Sports Direct store in Oxford Street, central London. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Wednesday January 6, 2016. Photo credit should read: Nick Ansell/PA Wire
A sign above the Sports Direct store in Oxford Street, central London. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Wednesday January 6, 2016. Photo credit should read: Nick Ansell/PA Wire

A High Court judge has torn a strip off a sportswear firm run by Newcastle United owner Mike Ashley.

Mr Justice Peter Smith said Sports Direct had abused court processes during a High Court dispute with Rangers.

The judge said his wanted to mark his disapproval of Sports Direct’s approach after analysing preliminary issues in the dispute at a High Court hearing in London.

Mr Justice Smith said Sports Direct was claiming that Rangers had breached a confidential agreement.

He said the firm had initially claimed £200, 000 damages. It had then reduced the damages claim to £50, 000.

Now it was not claiming any damages – but wanted the imposition of injunctions.

Mr Justice Smith said £200,000 was a threshold figure.

Claims for damages of £200,000 or more were analysed by judges in the High Court, while lesser damages claims were heard in lower civil courts.

He said he was “extremely suspicious” about the £200,000 figure.

The judge added: “The whole way that the claimants have been conducting themselves … shows that they have been abusing processes of the court in relation to the damages claim.”

A lawyer representing Rangers had earlier also complained about Sports Direct’s approach.

Barrister William McCormick QC told the judge: “They simply will not deal with us on a proper basis.

“I am sure it is not the lawyers. It must be because they are held by their instructions.”

Mr Justice Smith is due to analyse Sports Direct’s claim at a High Court trial in London in February.