Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Could this year be as dramatic as the last?

Could this year be as dramatic as the last?

That was a bumpy ride. Twists, turns, unexpected incidents, announcements, and of course one fairly major vote all made 2014 just about as dramatic a year as one could imagine.

And yet I can’t help but feel we’re in for another rollercoaster ride almost as soon as 2015 gets into full flow for those in political circles.

Having had a Christmas and New Year period relaxing, enjoying some sleep by gum it was needed and being able to catch up with loved ones, general election madness will begin to build almost immediately.

So what have we learned from the past 12 months and what will that mean for the 52 weeks ahead?

First of all, we learned that Scotland does not want independence. Although a couple of polls have produced Yes results since September 18 it’s worth remembering they do not matter. I repeat: they do not matter.

Samples of around 1,000 people, however well weighted, do not overrule the 3,619,915 who cast their vote when it mattered. For the record, they divided 2,001,926 in favour of No and 1,617,989 in favour of Yes.

That’s pretty close, roughly a 55/45 split, but it is decisive. Unless circumstances change dramatically there should be no call for another referendum. The people have had their say, no matter what some politicians, plenty of failed politicians and certain online echo chambers may claim.

Funnily enough, we learned something very important from this process which resonates particularly with next year’s general election in mind.

Politicians are terrified of losing their jobs and will jump through whatever ring of fire they feel they need to so we don’t sack them. You just need to look at the grovelling, last-minute offers and panicked visits from David Cameron, Ed Miliband and Nick Clegg when things looked neck and neck in the run-up to the referendum.

Expect more of the same as we approach May. The Tories have already started a tax cut giveaway, despite also telling us we’re locked into “austerity Britain”. I’m sure those sums will add up after the vote. Ahem.

Labour, meanwhile, doesn’t really seem to know what to say or do. A regular refrain in a book I’ve just finished reading was: “When in trouble or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout.”

It’s apparently an “ancient adage” from the US military but it seems to apply to those at the top of the UK’s official opposition at the moment. That’s because they’re scared, and so they should be.

Having seen consistent poll leads evaporate to the Conservatives, they are also staring the possibility of losing lots of seats to the SNP square in the face.

Why is this? Didn’t the SNP lose the referendum? Well, yes but there are multi-faceted explanations for why they have not fallen apart as could easily have happened.

One: their well-drilled organisation. Two: their well-drilled loyalty. Probably most importantly, three: Alex Salmond’s tactical masterstroke of resigning on September 19.

Senior figures in the SNP insist he didn’t have to go. He probably didn’t but in appearing to fall honourably on his sword he absorbed and dispelled all potential criticism in one fell swoop. It also moved attention from “what went wrong” to “what happens now”.

Instead of potentially getting the blame for losing, he has become a hero and galvanised support for his party. This has happened as membership has rocketed and a real drive for more devolved powers has emerged.

Let me say this now, for the record, I do not know a single person who voted No because they wanted further devolution. I fundamentally do not believe any promises were the reason for the referendum result.

However, there is now a massive issue for the main UK parties. They have so far hit their timetable for delivering more devolution but the Smith Commission itself, despite containing lots of powers, has received a mixed reception. It must now be delivered in full. Any other outcome would shatter any remaining trust in the Tories, Labour and Lib Dems.

What can we expect from the next year, then? Well, I predict Labour will bounce back to some degree under Jim Murphy and Kezia Dugdale’s leadership. Enough to stop them getting an election battering? Who knows, but it won’t be the same rudderless manner they’ve taken their lumps recently.

The SNP to at least double their seats at Westminster but not to approach the fantasy numbers being bandied about just now. First past the post and large majorities will count against them.

The Tories to sneak the largest number of seats at Westminster again. No commitment to whether or not they will secure a majority.

If they do that then it’s EU referendum time. Remember what I said about a dramatic change in circumstances?