Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Council refuses Redford wind turbines plan

North of Crofts Farm, where two turbines had been proposed.
North of Crofts Farm, where two turbines had been proposed.

A proposed wind development in south Angus has been refused due to an “unacceptable” impact on the surrounding landscape.

Crofts Farm Renewables had applied to install two turbines of almost 80 metres in height near Redford.

The scheme was to generate 1.6MW in total and developers planned to include an access track and electrical building.

But planners refused the application, as the height of the proposed turbines would have “an unacceptable landscape impact”.

It was felt the scale of the turbines would be greater than the nearby Cairnconon Hill, with council officers adding: “In essence, the ridge would look smaller and less pronounced than is currently the case.”

Case officer Ruari Kelly added: “While it is acknowledged that any wind turbine will have a substantial impact on the landscape of its immediate locality, it is considered that the proposed turbines relate poorly to the scale of the surrounding landscape and that significant effects upon landscape character are likely to occur.”

No objections were offered by consultees, while seven letters of objection and nine of support were submitted.

The site was 862 metres north-east of the village and is in use as agricultural land.

There are 20 residential properties located within 1km but planners felt no views from those houses would be enough to refuse the application.

Mr Kelly added: “Having regard to the physical relationship between the houses in the village and the turbines, I do not consider that the impact on their residential amenity would be so significant as to be unacceptable and justify refusal of the application as a result.”