Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner. Facebook Messenger An icon of the facebook messenger app logo. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Facebook Messenger An icon of the Twitter app logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. WhatsApp Messenger An icon of the Whatsapp messenger app logo. Email An icon of an mail envelope. Copy link A decentered black square over a white square.

Parent takes Evidence2Success survey complaints to information commissioner

Post Thumbnail

The information commissioner has been asked to investigate a controversial questionnaire asking primary school pupils about drugs and knife carrying.

The Evidence2Success project “wellbeing survey” provoked fury among Perthshire parents when the nature of the questions asked of children as young as nine were revealed.

Since the pupils completed the survey, many parents claim their consent was not sought and would not have been given if they had seen the questions in advance.

Comrie mother Deborah Thomas has referred the matter to the independent body which regulates information and data collection.

She said “serious breaches” of the Data Protection Act had occurred through the £225,000 survey, joint-funded by the council and NHS Tayside.

The commissioner has the power to fine a body up to £500,000 for improper use of data and order it to cease using data gathered incorrectly.

Mrs Thomas said it is “to her eternal shame” she did not realise the nature of the survey and stop her son completing it after he described it as “creepy and weird.”

She said the survey had “suggested to thousands of children the very real possibilities of carrying weapons, taking drugs, having sex and skipping school.”

Mrs Thomas said insufficient detail is given to children about what consent means.

She said: “They are told it is secret and confidential, but if you look at one of the first set of questions, there are several identifiers date of birth, age, sex, ethnicity, type of school, year in school that head teachers could easily link to a specific child.

“They were all deemed to have capacity from nine years old, whereas many did not have the life experience to understand their rights.

“Perth and Kinross (Council) offered an undated opt out flyer to some parents, but many parents did not receive this and many were unaware of the survey taking place until their child came home from school,” she continued.

“Parents were not told of the explicit nature of the questions to be posed to their children and were not offered explicit consent.

“It is my feeling, and that of many others, that Perth and Kinross Council education have paid lip service or do not understand the importance of explicit consent and the level of information they must provide to ensure that consent is informed and freely given.

“I have asked the council to suspend the data, pending a full review of practices.”

A spokesman said Perth and Kinross Council “strongly refutes” Mrs Thomas’s claims, stating: “We have taken great care in carrying out this work to ensure that it has been done according to the law.”

He said the questions were scrutinised by an committee of experts and the methodology of the survey tested by an academic.

He said the council has “no intention of suspending the data or carrying out a review based on the inaccurate claims of some opponents of the project” after the vast majority of parents, 89%, consented.