Calendar An icon of a desk calendar. Cancel An icon of a circle with a diagonal line across. Caret An icon of a block arrow pointing to the right. Email An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of the Facebook "f" mark. Google An icon of the Google "G" mark. Linked In An icon of the Linked In "in" mark. Logout An icon representing logout. Profile An icon that resembles human head and shoulders. Telephone An icon of a traditional telephone receiver. Tick An icon of a tick mark. Is Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes. Is Not Public An icon of a human eye and eyelashes with a diagonal line through it. Pause Icon A two-lined pause icon for stopping interactions. Quote Mark A opening quote mark. Quote Mark A closing quote mark. Arrow An icon of an arrow. Folder An icon of a paper folder. Breaking An icon of an exclamation mark on a circular background. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Caret An icon of a caret arrow. Clock An icon of a clock face. Close An icon of the an X shape. Close Icon An icon used to represent where to interact to collapse or dismiss a component Comment An icon of a speech bubble. Comments An icon of a speech bubble, denoting user comments. Ellipsis An icon of 3 horizontal dots. Envelope An icon of a paper envelope. Facebook An icon of a facebook f logo. Camera An icon of a digital camera. Home An icon of a house. Instagram An icon of the Instagram logo. LinkedIn An icon of the LinkedIn logo. Magnifying Glass An icon of a magnifying glass. Search Icon A magnifying glass icon that is used to represent the function of searching. Menu An icon of 3 horizontal lines. Hamburger Menu Icon An icon used to represent a collapsed menu. Next An icon of an arrow pointing to the right. Notice An explanation mark centred inside a circle. Previous An icon of an arrow pointing to the left. Rating An icon of a star. Tag An icon of a tag. Twitter An icon of the Twitter logo. Video Camera An icon of a video camera shape. Speech Bubble Icon A icon displaying a speech bubble WhatsApp An icon of the WhatsApp logo. Information An icon of an information logo. Plus A mathematical 'plus' symbol. Duration An icon indicating Time. Success Tick An icon of a green tick. Success Tick Timeout An icon of a greyed out success tick. Loading Spinner An icon of a loading spinner.

Jim Spence: Referees are useful fall-guys

Referee Jonathan Moss has had enough of listening to Arsene Wenger.
Referee Jonathan Moss has had enough of listening to Arsene Wenger.

The referee in football is always right. He or she never makes a wrong decision.

Before you mount your high horse, I’m not arguing that, but the laws of the game are. They state that every decision in a game of football is based on the referee’s opinion.

Logically then that means that unless something underhand is going on, then at the time a ref makes a decision, it’s the correct one.

Obviously it’s not that simple and a battery of camera angles in television replays can and do now show when a referee has erred. But at the time the decision was made, it was in the mind of the official, the correct one according to the laws of the game.

In a week when top English managers Jurgen Klopp and Arsene Wenger both had a blast at the men in black, it got me wondering what realistic improvements can be made to the current standards.

How would you improve the standards of refereeing in football? What actually can be done to ensure as few errors as possible occur?

Criticising from the terrace or armchair is easy but coming up with firm and practical proposals which are affordable and workable is a different ball game.

The game is arguably so quick now that one individual simply cannot keep up with play and cover all the necessary angles to spot every infringement or offside move.

Greater consistency is the war cry from fans and managers alike, but with no two situations on the pitch ever exactly the same, how logically can consistency apply to so many different situations?

Referees need all the help they can get and in the wake of tales of assault on young referees in England and fewer folk than ever coming forward to take refereeing up, the game needs to address the issue as a matter of urgency.

At top level, there is the money to make the game a full time trade as they’ve done in England. There is also the cash to bring in officials behind the goals, and instant TV replays could be used as in rugby.

None of these elements though, can guarantee that a referee’s decision will be accepted by fans. Supporters are not a homogeneous bunch anyhow. Some will agree with a decision and others will not. Usually the split is straight down party lines.

Recently I conducted an unscientific Twitter poll asking if fans would accept a penalty for their team even if they knew the referee had made a mistake in awarding it. Overwhelmingly those responding said they would take the penalty.

In my book that’s cheating.

Fans want referees to make the right decision all the time, unless it disadvantages them. That’s the nature of football. It’s tribal and not about logic. Managers and supporters want their team to win at practically any cost and if they don’t then the ref is a useful fall -guy.

If being a referee was such an attractive proposition, there would be a rush of ex-players to pick up the whistle, that fact that there isn’t tells its own tale.

Already a subscriber? Sign in

[[title]]

[[text]]